Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5783/2026 of G.Vijayan Vs The Inspector of Police on 26 October 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5783 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5783 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011465892026}
G.Vijayan
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Inspector of Police
Vadasery Police Station, Nagercoil,
Kanniyakumari District
2. Neelamurugesachamy
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 12.07.2026 .and 25.08.2026, conduct an enquiry and take appropriate action in accordance with law, in respect of the acts complained of by the petitioner.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr G.V. Vairam Santhosh
For Respondent(s):
Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Counsel for State of TN (Crl.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 12.07.2026 .and
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5783 of 2026 25.08.2026, conduct an enquiry and take appropriate action in accordance with law.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he has submitted a representation on 25.08.2026 seeking appropriate action against the second respondent, who allegedly received money from the petitioner by cheating him and thereafter, refused to return the property to him. Since no action was taken, the petitioner has come before this Court.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) , who accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent, would submit that the representation of the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law.
4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
5. In the light of the above observations and also the submissions made, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.08.2026, on its own merits and pass
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5783 of 2026 appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner and the second respondent. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the matter and that it is open to the first respondent to consider the same on its own merits. The outcome of the enquiry shall be communicated to the petitioner.
6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To
1. The Inspector of Police Vadasery Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5783 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5783 of 2026 26-10-2026