Central Administrative Tribunal
Mohamad Akber Mir vs POWER on 29 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL SRINAGAR
Order Sheet
Item no.: 14
T.A./6877/2020 (SRINAGAR)
[ INTEREST ]
[ SENIOR CITIZEN ]
SWP/WP NO. 1476/2018
Court No.: 2
No of Adjournment: 25
Order Dated: 29/10/2026
MOHAMAD AKBER MIR
Vs
POWER
For Applicant(s) Advocate : MR. L A LATIEF THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE
For Respondent(s) Advocate : MR. RAIS UD DIN GANAIE, DAG
Order of The Tribunal
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Various detailed orders were passed from time to time. On 09.08.2025, in the given facts and circusmstances of the case, the exemplary costs of Rs. 2000/- was imposed upon the respondents to be deposited in the CAT Library Fund, Srinagar Bench, under a proper receipt, to be borne by the Superintendent Engineer, Power Development (M&RE) Wing South Circle Pulwama, Kashmir and Executive Engineer, Electric Division Pulwama, from their personal earnings.
2. Thereafter, the matter came up on 28.10.2026. In view of the non- compliance of the earlier order, this Court was compelled to seek the personal presence of the Superintending Engineer, Power Development (M&RE), Wing, South Circle, Pulwama and Executive Engineer, Electric Division Pulwama, on 29.10.2026 at 11:30 AM.
3. Today, the matter came up for consideration. Mr. Kaiser Khaleel Qadri, Superintending Engineer, Power Development (M&RE), Wing, South Circle, Pulwama and Mr. Rafiq Ahmad, Executive Engineer, Electric Division Pulwama, are present in person before this Court.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that they have already filed their reply on 17.10.2024. However, the same has been denied by Mr. L. A. Latief, learned counsel for the applicant, stating that he has not received any copy of the reply.
5. Be that as it may.
6. Let a copy of the reply be provided by the learned counsel for the respondents to the other side through any available mode, on the assurance given by the officers present before the Court that the costs will be deposited within two weeks positively.
7. In view of the assurance given, this Court is taking a lenient view, otherwise this Court would have initiated recovery proceedings under the provisions of the Land Revenue Act, and same referred to the District Collector under the Land Revenue Act of District Pulwama.
8. The personal presence of the officials is dispensed with, however, subject to the deposition of the costs within two weeks positively.
9. List on 01.12.2026. M. S. Latif Member (J) Abhishek Punia ( court master )