Madras High Court

WP(MD)/30312/2026 of Sellasamy Vs The District Collector on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 30312 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 26-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

AND

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.D.SUMATHI

WP(MD) No. 30312 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011503542026}

Sellasamy,

Door No.51, North Street,

Vathanakottai,

Kulathur Taluk,

Pudukkottai District.

..Petitioner

Vs

1. The District Collector,

Pudukkottai District,

Pudukkottai.

2. The Tahsildar

Taluk Office

Kulathur At Keeranur

Pudukkottai District.

3. The Block Development Officer

Block Development Office

Kundrandarkovil

Pudukkottai District.

4. Sathiyamoorthy

Vathanakottai,

Kulathur Taluk,

Pudukkottai District.

5. Manikandan

Vathanakottai,

Kulathur Taluk,

Pudukkottai District.

WP(MD) No. 30312 of 2026

6. Raman

Vathanakottai,

Kulathur Taluk,

Pudukkottai District.

..Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment in pathway in survey No.

70/9, 430/1 and 430/3, situated at Vathanakottai Village, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District based on the petitioners representation dated 18.06.2026 and 15.07.2026.

For Petitioner:

Mr.M.Ramu

For Respondents:

Mr.M.Kannan,

Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 3. Issuance of notice to the respondents 4 to 6 is dispensed with.

2. The writ petitioner is a resident of Vathanakottai Village. According to him, the petition mentioned survey numbers have been encroached upon by the private respondents. He wants the same to be removed.

WP(MD) No. 30312 of 2026

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader admitted that the petition mentioned survey numbers have been classified as “cart track/pathway”. Encroachment on a pathway is impermissible. The second respondent herein is directed to issue notices to the private respondents herein. After conducting enquiry, if the second respondent is satisfied that the private respondents do not have any defence, then, the encroachment shall be removed. Due process of law shall be followed. The entire exercise shall be concluded within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. (G.R.S.,J.) (M.D.S.,J.) 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No IAS To

1. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2. The Tahsildar Taluk Office Kulathur At Keeranur Pudukkottai District.

3. The Block Development Officer Block Development Office Kundrandarkovil, Pudukkottai District.

WP(MD) No. 30312 of 2026 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND M.D.SUMATHI, J. IAS WP(MD) No. 30312 of 2026 26-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead