Central Administrative Tribunal

Hussain K vs UNION TERRITORY on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

ERNAKULAM BENCH

Original Application No. 181/00548/2026

Friday, this the 30th day of October, 2026

CORAM:

HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER

HON'BLE Mrs. V. RAMA MATHEW, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

Hussain K., aged 59 years, S/o Bamban,

Senior Auditor, Pay and Accounts Office (Pension Wing), Kavaratti, Union Territory of Lakshadweep - 682 555, Residing at Kottaram House, Kavaratti.

- Applicant

[By Advocates : Mr. T.C. Govindasamy, Mrs. Kala T. Gopi Mr. Kailesh T. Gopi, Mrs. Nishitha Balachandran]

V e r s u s

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Administrator, Union Territory of Lakshadweep, Lakshadweep Administration, Kavaratti – 682 555.

2. The Special Secretary (Services), Secretariat, Service Section, Kavaratti, Union Territory of Lakshadweep - 682 555.

3. The Principal Pay and Accounts Officer, Pay and Accounts Office (Pension Wing), Lakshadweep Administration, Kavaratti, Union Territory of Lakshadweep - 682 555. - Respondents [By Advocates : Mr. P. Sreekumar, ASG, Mr. Prenjith Kumar] The Original Application having been heard on 30.10.2026, the Tribunal on the same day delivered the following:

A X Sherin

O R D E R (Oral):- Per: Justice Sunil Thomas, Judicial Member We have heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned ASG appearing for the respondents.

2. Learned Counsel for the applicant pointed out that the applicant is due for retirement on 28.02.2027 and accordingly, the transfer is in violation of the DoPT guidelines.

3. Learned ASG appearing for the Lakshadweep Administration, who vehemently opposed granting of any interim relief contended that the applicant is a Group 'B' Officer, who has been transferred due to administrative exigencies and the bar under clause 16 of Annexure A-2 will not apply in the case of such officers.

4. Having considered the fact that the applicant is due for superannuation on 28.02.2027, we are inclined to direct the respondents to consider Annexure A-3 representation submitted by the applicant and to pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a

A X Sherin period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Annexure A-1 transfer order, to the extent it applies to the applicant will be deferred till the order is passed.

4. The OA is disposed of as above. No costs. (Dated, 30th October, 2026)

V. RAMA MATEHW JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER ax

A X Sherin

List of Annexures in OA/548/2026 Annexure A-1- A true copy of the Office Order F.No. A-22011/2/2026- Estt.GAP/501 dated 17.10.2026, issued by the Special Secretary (Services), to the extent it transfers the Applicant, shown at Sl. No. 399, from the Directorate of Education, Kavaratti to Minicoy, with implementation directed by 01.11.202 Annexure A-2 - A copy of the transfer policy dated 07.03.2012. Annexure A-3: A true copy of the representation dated nil October., 2026. ******

A X Sherin

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead