Madras High Court

WP/4722/2026 of Periya ponnu Vs The District collector on 16 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 4722 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.KARTHIKEYAN

WP No. 4722 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA010234662026}

Periya Ponnu,

W/o. Ranganathan,

Kumbalampadi village,

Indur Post, Nathahalli Taluk.

Dharmapuri District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector,

Office of District Collector,

Dharmapuri District.

2. The District Revenue Officer,

Office of Revenue Divisional office,

Dharmapuri District.

3. The Tahsildar,

Office of Tahsildhar,

Nallampalli, Dharmapuri District.

4. Appunu Gounder,

Kumbalampadi Village,

Indur Post, Nathahalli Taluk,

Dharmapuri District.

..Respondent(s)

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of mandamus, directing the 3rd Respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.09.2025 and consequently pass order to remove the encroachment of construction of Paatai Poromboke lands vide S.No.733 in Kubalampadi village, Nathahalli Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

WP No. 4722 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.R.Ramesh

For Respondent(s):

Mr.G.Abraham Prabhu

Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3

Mr.S.M.S.Shriram Narayanan for R4

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) With reference to the relief sought for in the present writ petition, the Tahsildar, Nallampalli has given a written instructions to the Additional Government Pleader vide letter dated 12.10.2026. The Tahsildar has stated that, during the course of the survey, encroachments were identified.

2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 4th respondent would submit that a civil suit has been instituted and is pending adjudication. However, grounds raised by the 4th respondent may be placed before the competent authorities, which shall be considered upon issuance of show cause notice under the relevant provisions of the Act. However, the authorities formed an opinion that there is an encroachment identified during survey.

3. Thus, the official respondents are directed to proceed with the enforcement action by following the procedures as contemplated under the

WP No. 4722 of 2026

relevant statutes and rules after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to both the petitioner and the 4th respondent.

4. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (B.K.,J.) 16-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KKN To

1. The District Collector, Office of District Collector, Dharmapuri District.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Office of Revenue Divisional office, Dharmapuri District.

3. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildhar, Nallampalli, Dharmapuri District.

WP No. 4722 of 2026

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND B.KARTHIKEYAN, J. KKN WP No. 4722 of 2026 16-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead