Madras High Court
WP(MD)/30113/2026 of R.Vellammal Vs The District Collector on 16 October 2026
WP(MD) No. 30113 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.D.SUMATHI
WP(MD) No. 30113 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011490162026}
&
W.M.P.(MD)Nos.22992 & 22995 of 2026
1. R.Vellammal,
1/69, North Paraipatti,
Meenakshinaikanpatti Post,
Pallapatti, Dindigul District.
2. S.Anadhakumar
1/65, North Paraipatti
Meenakshinaikanpatti Post,
Paliapatti, Dindigul District.
3. P.Eswari
North Paraipatti,
Meenakshinaikanpatti Post,
Pallapatti, Dindigul District.
4. P.Subramani
58, North Paraipatti, Meenakshinaikanpatti Post, Pallapatti, Dindigul District.
5. S.Pazhanisami
17, North Paraipatti,
Meenakshinaikanpatti Post,
Pallapatti, Dindigul District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District Collector,
Dindigul District, Dindigul.Dindigul
WP(MD) No. 30113 of 2026
2. The Tahsildar
Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.
3. The Revenue Inspector
Dindigul West Taluk,
Dindigul District.
4. Saraswathi
W/o.Not known,
North Paraipatti, Meenakshinaikanpatti Post, Pallapatti, Dindigul District.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of CERTIORARI calling for the records relating to the impugned Notice in Na.Ka.No.4038/2026/A3
dated 03.09.2026 by the 3rd respondent, quash the same in so far as petitioners are concerned as illegal.
For Petitioner(s):
M/s M.Suresh
For Respondent(s):
Mr.M.S.Parthiban
Government Advocate (Civil Side)
for R1 to R3
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for R1 to R3.
2. What is under challenge is a notice under Section 7 of the Act. Such notice is neither a decision nor order. We have already held that it
WP(MD) No. 30113 of 2026 is not amenable to appeal under Section 10 of the Act. If it is not appealable, the question of impugning it under writ jurisdiction will not arise at all. Of-course, if the very issuance of notice is without jurisdiction, the party can come before us. That is clearly not the case. Be that as it may, the petitioner has given some objections on 11.09.2026.
3. The third respondent is directed to conduct a summary enquiry and consider the petitioner's objections and then pass an appropriate order. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (G.R.S.,J.) (M.D.S.,J.) 16-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rmi To
1. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.Dindigul
2. The Tahsildar Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.
3. The Revenue Inspector Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.
WP(MD) No. 30113 of 2026 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND M.D.SUMATHI, J. rmi WP(MD) No. 30113 of 2026 16-10-2026