Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23695/2026 of Ragu @ Raghu Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By In on 15 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP(MD) No. 23695 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 15-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

CRL OP(MD) No. 23695 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011500002026}

1. Ragu @ Raghu

S/o.Ravi,

No. 230/1, Arisana Street,

Vadakkukottai,

Orathanadu Taluk,

Thanjavur District.

2. Naveen

S/o.Ravi,

No. 230/1, Arisana Street,

Vadakkukottai,

Orathanadu Taluk,

Thanjavur District.

3. Gunasekar @ Gunasekaran

S/o.Veerasamy,

No. 250, Adithravidar Street,

Thirunallur Post

Orathanadu Taluk,

Thanjavur District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pappanadu Police Station, Thanjavur District.

Crime No. 1174/2020

2. Shanmugam

S/o.Ganaprakasam @ Ganappa,

No. 182, North Street,

Kilamangalam,

Orathanadu Taluk,

Thanjavur District.

CRL OP(MD) No. 23695 of 2026

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned charge sheet in C.C. No.1012 of 2025, on the file of the Learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu and quash the same as far as these petitioners are concerned and pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice thereby render justice.

For Petitioner(s)

:M/s.C.Senthil Murugan

For Respondent(s)

:M/S.B.Arun,

Government Advocate (crl.side)

For R1

Mr.M.Ramesh

For R2

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present petition has been filed by the Accused Nos.1, 2 & 4 in C.C.No.1012 of 2025 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu seeking to quash the charge sheet, wherein, the petitioners are alleged to have committed offence punishable under sections 294(b), 341, 342, 506(2), 147, 148 and 326 of IPC.

CRL OP(MD) No. 23695 of 2026

2. Pending trial, the parties have entered into a compromise, wherein, the defacto complainant has agreed for quashing of the charge sheet.

3. The defacto complainant is present in-person before this Court and he submits that he had agreed for quashing of charge sheet as against the petitioners.

4. Considering the above said facts, charge sheet in C.C.No.1012 of 2025, on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu is hereby quashed as against the petitioners.

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. 15-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No gvn

CRL OP(MD) No. 23695 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. gvn To

1. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu.

2. The Inspector of Police, Pappanadu Police Station, Thanjavur District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. CRL OP(MD) No. 23695 of 2026 15-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead