Central Administrative Tribunal
Deepak Kumar Shrivastava vs DEPARTMENT OF POSTS on 28 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,
JABALPUR BENCH
JABALPUR
Original Application No.200/01014/2026
Jabalpur, this Wednesday, the 28th day of October, 2026
HON’BLE SMT MALLIKA ARYA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
1. Deepak Kumar Shrivastava S/o Late Shri Babu Lal Shrivastava, Aged- 63 Years, Occupation- Retired from Postal Department, R/o 41, Near Gayatri School, Nimbalkar Ki Goth, Lashkar Gwalior, M.P.-474001 (M)
7987325454
2. Vijay Kumar Gupta S/o Late Shri Ram Charan Lal Gupta, Aged- 64
Years, Occupation- Retired from Postal Department, R/o 08, Sarathi Parisar, Suresh Nagar, Thatipur, Gwalior, M.P.- 474011 (M) 9406983353
3. O.P. Baghel So Late Shri Ghanshyam Das Baghel, Aged-63 Years, Occupation-Retired from Postal Department, R/o C-31, Vinay Nagar, Sector-3, Gwalior, M.P.- 474009 (M) 9425724986
4. Smt. Sucheta Dharmadhikari Wo Shri Dattatreya Dharmadhikari, Aged- 64 Years, Occupation- Retired from Postal Department, R/o Gadway Ki Goth, Near Tube Well, Lashkar, Gwalior, M.P.- 474001 (M) 8120141744
-Applicant
(By Advocate – Shri Alok Kumar Sharma, through VC)
V e r s u s
1. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Communication & IT, Department of Post, Dak Bhavan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110001.
2. Department of Personnel & Training through its Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pension, Government of India, Lok Kalyan Bhavan, Khan Market New Delhi - 110003.
VISHAL
KUSHWAH
3. Chief Post Master General, M.P. Circle, 2nd Floor, Dak Bhavan, Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal, M.P. - 462012.
4. Senior Superintendent of Post Office, Gwalior Division, Gwalior, M.P.
- 474006
5. Superintendent of Post Office, Chambal Division, Morena, M.P. -
476001.
- Respondents
(By Advocate – Shri Rajendra Singh Dhakar, through VC)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
By Mallika Arya, AM: This Original Application has been filed by the applicants being aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not considering the period of service/training rendered as Postal Assistant under Reserved Training Pool Scheme.
2. The counsel for the applicants has submitted that the representations of the applicants (Annexure A/4) have not been decided till date. The applicants will be satisfied if the respondents be directed to decide the representations of the applicants in light of the earlier orders passed by this Tribunal in respect of similarly situated employees, in a time bound manner.
VISHAL KUSHWAH
3. The counsel for the respondents has no objection if this Original Application is disposed of in above terms.
4. Accordingly, this Original Application is disposed at the admission stage with direction to the respondents to decide the representations of the applicants (Annexure A/4) in light of the earlier orders passed by this Tribunal if the applicants are found similarly situated, by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
5. The applicants are directed to provide a copy of the order of this Tribunal along with the copy of Original Application to the competent authority.
6. All pending M.A.(s), if any, stands disposed.
(MallikaArya)
Administrative Member VK/-
VISHAL KUSHWAH