Central Administrative Tribunal

DINESH GOYAL vs REVENUE on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JABALPUR Order Sheet Item no.: 15 O.A./68/2026 (JABALPUR) [ REGULARISATION ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 4 Order Dated: 30/10/2026 DINESH GOYAL Vs REVENUE

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Ms. Ani Agarwal, proxy counsel for Shri Shubham Nanepag For Respondent(s) Advocate : Ms. Sakshi Tripathi, proxy counsel for Ms. Seema Sharma, through VC Order of The Tribunal The matter is taken up through VC. M.A./1713/2025 for prosecuting the Original Application jointly has already been allowed. Accordingly, M.A./1713/2025 is disposed. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to file reply. Time is granted with the direction that reply must be filed within four weeks. List this matter for further consideration on 09.02.2027 during the Circuit Court Sittings at Indore. Smt Mallika Arya Member (A) Vishal Kushwah ( steno 'c' )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead