Central Administrative Tribunal
Ulhas Madhavrao Rangar vs ACCOUNTANT GENERAL on 29 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 2 M.A./1032/2026 (NAGPUR) [ CONDONATION OF DELAY ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] In Diary No.: 1079/2026 MACP Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 29/10/2026 ULHAS MADHAVRAO RANGAR Vs ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Adv. Tejal A Agre For Respondent(s) Advocate : Adv. B D Pandit Order of The Tribunal We have heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Agre, submits that the impugned order is with respect to exercise of option. In a way it pertains to fixation of pay.
3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents, Shri Pandit objects to it on the ground that there is inordinate delay for which no explanation is forthcoming.
4. In this circumstances,we find that the present Original Application pertains to fixation of pay, therefore it is continuous cause of action as held in the case of Union of India & Ors vs Tarsem Singh 2008 (8) SCC 648.
5. Having regard to that as stated above, since it is continuous cause of action being pay fixation, the delay is condoned. MA No. 1032/2026 is allowed and disposed of.
6. Issue notice to the respondents on registration of OA. Stand over to January, 2027 Circuit Sitting of Nagpur. Sangam Narain Srivastava Member (A) Justice M.G.Sewlikar Member (J) C Kumar ( court master )