Central Administrative Tribunal

Radha Raman Murlidhar Dubey Crly vs RAILWAY on 28 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 24 M.A./748/2026 (MUMBAI) [ CONDONATION OF DELAY ] In O.A./506/2017 MACP M.A./751/2026 M.A./749/2026 LEGAL HEIR Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 28/10/2026 RADHA RAMAN MURLIDHAR DUBEY CRLY Vs RAILWAY

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. K K Mishra For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. D A Dube Order of The Tribunal OA No. 506/2017 was dismissed in default on 16.06.2026.

2. The present restoration application has been filed by the legal representatives of the deceased employee by stating the fact that the original applicant expired on 29.06.2026 and after getting the knowledge of the order, they have filed the present application for restoration i.e. MA No. 751/2026 and there is a delay in filing the restoration application, therefore, separate MA No. 748/2026 has been filed.

3. On the basis of advance notice of these applications, Shri Dube appears on behalf of official respondents, who has represented in the OA. Both the applications have been objected by the learned counsel for the respondents on the ground that no proper explanation has been made by the present applicants.

4. We have heard learned counsel for the applicant on MA No. 748/2026.

5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of the record, it is not in dispute that original applicant has expired on 29.06.2026, as per the death certificate. Thereafter, some time is passed for taking the rituals and thereafter if the present applicants, who are stated to be legal representatives of the deceased employee are filing the present application before this Tribunal for revival of the case, then in such circumstances, taking a liberal approach, delay is condoned and consequently, restoration application is also allowed.

6. OA is directed to be restored to its original no.

7. Office is directed to list the MA No. 749/2026 in the OA on 10.12.2026. Later on: Learned counsel for the applicant requested for postponement of the date to 11.12.2026.. The same is allowed. List the matter on 11.12.2026. MR. UMESH GAJANKUSH Member (J) Mr. Shri Krishna Member (A) Rashmi ( )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead