Madras High Court
WP(MD)/29392/2026 of Jegan Vs The Managing Director on 12 October 2026
WP(MD) No. 29392 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
WP(MD) No. 29392 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011455302026}
AND
WMP(MD) NO. 22327 OF 2026 & WMP(MD) NO. 22328 OF 2026
Jegan
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Managing Director
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation
Limited,
CMDA Tower-II, IV Floor,
Egmore,
Chennai - 600 008.
2. The Senior Regional Manager
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation
Limited,
TASMAC Ltd.,
Trichy.
3. The District Manager
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation
Limited,
TASMAC Ltd.,
Thanjavur District.
..Respondent(s)
__________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 02:24:53 pm )
WP(MD) No. 29392 of 2026
PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of CERTIORARIFIED
MANDAMUS to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 3rd Respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1-1070-2026 dated 18.09.2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner into service with all continuation, service benefits and monetary benefits to the Petitioner from 18.09.2026
till the date of reinstatement.
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. K.Navaneetharaja
For Respondent(s)
: Mr.H.Arumugam
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The petitioner, who is working as a Salesman in a TASMAC shop, has challenged the order of punishment dated 18.09.2026 issued by the third respondent.
2. When this Writ Petition is taken up for hearing, Mr. H. Arumugam, learned counsel takes notice for the respondents and submits that the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy before the second respondent.
3. In view of the fact that the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy before the second respondent, this Writ Petition is disposed of, __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 02:24:53 pm )
WP(MD) No. 29392 of 2026 granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his appellate remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 12-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No mbi __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 02:24:53 pm )
WP(MD) No. 29392 of 2026 B.PUGALENDHI J. mbi WP(MD) No. 29392 of 2026 12-10-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 02:24:53 pm )