Central Administrative Tribunal

S Ganesan vs UT OF PUDUCHERRY on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI Order Sheet Item no.: 37 O.A./422/2026 (CHENNAI) [ REGULARISATION ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 8 Order Dated: 30/10/2026 S GANESAN Vs UT OF PUDUCHERRY

For Applicant(s) Advocate : M/S.PRAKASH ADIAPADAM

For Respondent(s) Advocate : MR.R.SYED MUSTAFA Order of The Tribunal Heard CFA. CFR represented. CFA drew our attention to the last paragraph in page no. 176. We are convinced with the submissions of the CFA. CFR submitted that the respondents require three more months time to complete the process. We are not convinced with the submissions made by CFR. List this matter under the caption for orders on 17.11.2026. M.L.Srivastava Member (A) M.SWAMINATHAN Member (J) Latha C ( consultant(ps) )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead