Central Administrative Tribunal
DASSAN vs SOUTHERN RAILWAY on 29 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI Order Sheet Item no.: 5 O.A./821/2022 (CHENNAI) [ COUNTING OF PAST SERVICE ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 23 Order Dated: 29/10/2026 DASSAN Vs SOUTHERN RAILWAY
For Applicant(s) Advocate : M/S.RATIO LEGIS
For Respondent(s) Advocate : MR.S.NAGARAJAN Order of The Tribunal Heard both counsels in part. CFA has produced service register of the applicant to show that his appointment on 24.09.1971 was on regular basis with regular payscale and was given annual increment. However, in the reply statement, it is stated that he is appointed on contengency basis. CFR seeks time to get clarification with respect to the status of the appointment of the applicant in the year 1971 and applicability of Rule 20 to applicant as contended by CFA. List the matter on 16.11.2026. Veena Kothavale Member (J) Lokesh ( steno 'c' )