Central Administrative Tribunal

Sarmishtha vs EXPENDITURE on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW 7/5, GOMTI NAGAR EXTENSION, LUCKNOW Order Sheet Item no.: 7 O.A./629/2026 (LUCKNOW) [ TRANSFER ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 3 Order Dated: 30/10/2026 SARMISHTHA Vs EXPENDITURE

For Applicant(s) Advocate : PRAVEEN KUMAR

For Respondent(s) Advocate : PRAYAGMATI GUPTA Order of The Tribunal Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is granted permission to file objections regarding the grant of interim relief during the course of the day in the registry. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is granted one week's time to file reply thereto. List the matter on 03.11.2026.

PANKAJ KUMAR Member (A) Vidya Waghela ( ps )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead