Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1521/2026 on 2 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1521 of 2026 Decided on: 02.11.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Rajesh Kumar
...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Parkash Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General has produced instructions dated 31.10.2026 issued by the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla- 171001 and copy of office order dated 18.06.2024, passed by the Director Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order reveals that in compliance with the judgment passed by this Court, the petitioner has been considered as deemed regular employee of the State in the pay scale of Rs.10300-34800 + Grade Pay plus other allowances from the date when he was
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 03:02:42 :::CIS
initially appointed/joined on contract basis with all consequential benefits, however, monetary benefits are restricted to a period of three years only immediately preceding the date of filing the petition.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 13.05.2024, passed in CWPOA No.1453 of 2020, titled, Himachal Government Teachers Union and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been complied with and only the arrears remain to be paid to the petitioner, there is no willful disobedience on the part of the respondents and as such the contempt notices issued to them are discharged.
4. However, it is made clear that in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from today, the respondents may take appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
nd November
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 03:02:42 :::CIS