Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2308/2026 on 2 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:48247
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2308
of 2026
Decided on: 02
nd November, 2026
_______________________________________________________ Ajay Kumar and others
....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & others
...Respondents ________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General. . Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 31.10.2026 and copy of office order dated 21.09.2026 passed by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171001, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order reveals that the petitioners have been allowed higher pay scale after two years of regular service, subject to the final outcome of LPA filed in CWP No.4830 of 2023, titled as Inder Singh and any other legal remedies. The DDOs concerned have been directed to fix the pay of the petitioners and release the arrears. However, an undertaking be obtained from the petitioners that the overpayment if any, found in
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 03:03:45 :::CIS
later stage shall be recovered from them accordingly.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 18.05.2026, passed in CWP No.6767 of 2026, titled, Ajay Kumar and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has duly been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, it is made clear that since the competent authority has now held the petitioners entitled to higher pay scale after two years of regular service, the respondents are under obligation to pay the arrears, which shall be subject to final outcome of the aforesaid LPA. In case, the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioners within eight weeks from today, they shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the present execution petition.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
nd November, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 03:03:45 :::CIS