EX.P./2334/2026 on 2 November 2026

2026:HHC:48244

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2334

of 2026

Decided on: 02

nd November, 2026

_______________________________________________________ Sudesh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others

...Respondents ________________________________________________________

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Saurav, Advocate vice Mr. Pranav Kaushal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General.. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)

Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 30.10.2026 issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh and copy of office order dated 06.10.2026, passed by the Deputy Director Elementary Education (Elementary), District Sirmaur at Nahan (HP), which are taken on record.

2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order reveals that the petitioner has been allowed the higher pay stage of Rs.40,100/- after completion of two years of regular service, subject to final outcome of LPA filed in CWP No.4830 of 2023, titled as Inder Singh and any other legal remedies. The DDO concerned has been

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 03:04:00 :::CIS

directed to prepare the arrear. However, an undertaking to this effect shall be obtained from the petitioner that the overpayment if any, found in later stage shall be recovered from him accordingly.

3. This Court while disposing of the writ petition had only directed the competent authority to decide the representation made by the petitioner.

4. Since the competent authority has now decided the representation and the petitioner has been held entitled to the higher pay stage of Rs.40,100/- after completion of two years of regular service subject to final outcome of LPA, the mandate contained in the judgment dated 27.05.2026, passed in CWP No.7956 of 2026, titled, Sudesh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has duly been complied with and as such the petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that in case the arrear is not released in favour of the petitioner within twelve weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to avail an appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

5. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

nd November, 2026

( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 03:04:00 :::CIS