EX.P./2532/2026 on 2 November 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Execution Petition No.2532 of 2026 Date of Decision: 02.11.2026 _______________________________________________________ Rajesh Kumar

…….Petitioner

Versus HRTC & Ors.

… Respondents _______________________________________________________

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? 1

For the Petitioner: Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):

By way of instant Execution Petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of directions to the respondents for implementation and execution of the order/judgment dated 17.06.2025 passed by this Court in CWP No.9719 of 2025, titled as Rajesh Kumar Vs. HRTC & Ors., whereby afore petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide case of the petitioner in light of judgment passed in CWP No. 11982 of 2024 titled as Dilbag Singh Vs. HRTC & Ors.. Since, despite there being specific direction to do the needful, as taken note herein above, respondents failed to comply with the judgment, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.

2. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned counsel for the respondents, while accepting notice on behalf of the respondents, states that

Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 03:04:12 :::CIS

though he has every reason to believe and presume that by now aforesaid orders, sought to be executed, must have been complied with, but if not, same would be complied with within a period of two weeks from today.

3. Consequently, in view of the afore undertaking given by learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and as such, same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents to do the needful, positively within a period of two weeks, if not already done, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings.

(Sandeep Sharma),

Judge November 02, 2026 (sunil)

High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 03:04:12 :::CIS