W.P.(CRL)/3420/2026 of NARESH GAUR Vs STATE (GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. on 2 November 2026

1. This writ petition has been filed by Suraj Gaur, claiming himself to be son of the prisoner Naresh Gaur. What the petitioner Suraj Gaur seeks is mandamus, directing the respondents to disclose complete medical records of the prisoner Naresh Gaur.

2. At the outset, in my considered opinion, the writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked to obtain information, that too related to a third person. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that personally he did not visit the jail to interview the prisoner Naresh Gaur and ascertain facts before filing this petition. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569a f3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557099 6b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.11.02 18:17:16 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:02.11.2026 18:19:40 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2 pages

3. Besides, there is nothing to suggest that the prisoner Naresh Gaur is not on inimical terms with the present petitioner Suraj Gaur, though they are father and son. In such situation, divulging such information to petitioner Suraj Gaur can be detrimental to the prisoner.

4. There is also no clarity about the purpose for which the above information is sought. For, as and when a prisoner seeks bail or furlough or parole on his medical grounds, the records are always produced before the court. Learned counsel is not aware as to whether the information sought in the present writ petition is in order to enable him to seek any of those reliefs.

5. At this stage, during dictation of this order, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the purpose of filing this writ petition is that the petitioner is contemplating to file an application before the competent authority for premature release. But as rightly submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of ASC, the information about medical record of the prisoner would have no bearing on his contemplated request for premature release. Further, learned counsel appearing on behalf of ASC assures that the jail authorities have already been providing appropriate medical treatment to every prisoner including the petitioner and would continue to do so.

6. The present petition is dismissed.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) NOVEMBER 2, 2026/ry GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569a f3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996 b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.11.02 18:17:00 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:02.11.2026 18:19:40 Signature Not Verified