Central Administrative Tribunal
Kajal vs DEFENCE on 16 October 2026
O.A.No.1235/2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CHANDIGARH BENCH
O.A. No.1235/2026
Chandigarh, this the 16th day of October, 2026
HON’BLE MR. RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MRS. ANJALI BHAWRA, MEMBER (A)
Kajal aged about 22 years D/o Bhoop Singh, VPO Bhuthan Kalan, District Fatehabad, Haryana 125050.
…Applicant
(BY ADVOCATES: Mr. Dilpreet Singh Gandhi (through V.C) along with Jashan Chopra)
VERSUS
1.
Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi 110011.
2.
The Controller General of Defence Accounts, Office of the CGDA, Ulan Batar Road, Palam, Delhi Cantt. 110010.
3.
The Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Southern Command), No. 1 Finance Road, Pune 411001, Maharashtra.
4.
The Staff Selection Commission through its Chairman, Block No. 12, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003.
5.
The Regional Director (North Western Region), Staff Selection Commission, Block No. 3, Ground Floor, Kendriya Sadan, Sector 9, Chandigarh - 160009.
6.
Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology, Hisar, Haryana 125001, through its Registrar.
...Respondents
(BY ADVOCATES: Mr. Sanjay Goyal, Sr. SGSC along with Ms. Jyotika Panesar for R1-3, Mr. Sahil Batra, Adv., for R4-5 and Mr. Brij Mohan Vashistha for R-6)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Per: RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J):
1. Heard for some time.
2026.10.30 12:54:48+05'30' BHANU PARTAP
O.A.No.1235/2026
2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the Competent Authority has considered the matter and it has been intimated that the same is subject to verification.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has relied upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, in similar circumstances, in WP(C) No.2888/2015 decided on 09.07.2015 (Annexure A-14).
4. We have considered the matter and are of the view that the matter in present O.A is fully covered by the judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.
5. In view of such a position, this O.A is disposed of with direction to the respondents that in view of the similar circumstances to that of judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, the case of applicant shall be considered for appointment afresh, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly.
6. The O.A is disposed of as above. No order as to costs.
(ANJALI BHAWRA) (RAMESH SINGH THAKUR) Member (A) Member (J) bp
2026.10.30 12:54:48+05'30' BHANU PARTAP