Central Administrative Tribunal

Asha Ram vs M/o Defence on 30 October 2026

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH Order Sheet Item no.: 52 O.A./38/2021 (SHIMLA) [ PAY AND ALLOWANCES ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 42 Order Dated: 30/10/2026 ASHA RAM Vs M/O DEFENCE

For Applicant(s) Advocate : SH. RISHAV SHARMA

For Respondent(s) Advocate : SH. SANJAY GOYAL SENIOR CGSC ALONG WITH MS. PALAK SINGLA Order of The Tribunal Heard learned counsel for respondents. Respondents are directed to clarify that when once the suspension period of the applicant has been regularised on the strength of various judicial pronoucements, how the cut of 25 % salary during the suspension period can be allowed in the absence of any order of punishment. They are also directed to apprise the power of authority to cut 25% salary in pay during the suspension period. Last opportunity is granted to respondents to clarify the position. List on 29.01.2027 as part heard.

Rashmi Saxena Sahni Member (A) Suresh Kumar Batra Member (J) Dinky Bansal ( steno 'd' )

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead