Central Administrative Tribunal
Vijay vs Smt. Manisha Bansai Badal, on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH Order Sheet Item no.: 2 C.P./225/2026 (CHANDIGARH) In O.A./684/2025 REGULARISATION Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 27/10/2026 VIJAY Vs SMT. MANISHA BANSAI BADAL,
For Applicant(s) Advocate : SH. ROHIT SETH
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Order of The Tribunal The petitioner has preferred instant CP against respondents alleging wilful and intentional disobedience of order dated 23.04.2026 passed by this Tribunal in OA No. 684/2025 read with order dated 03.09.2026 passed in CWP No. 28293/2026. The order dated 23.04.2026 passed by this Tribunal has been assailed by UOI by way of CWP No. 28293/2026 before the Hon'ble High Court. The Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 03.09.2026 disposed of the CWP with observations as under:
4. On advance notice, Mr. Rohit Seth, Advocate appeared on behalf of respondents and submits that the regularization of the services of the respondents herein can be done “prospectively" in case the time frame fixed by the Tribunal is complied with.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed. There are reasonable grounds to issue notice to respondents. Let notice be issued to respondents returnable within a period of six weeks.
List on 18.12.2026.
Rashmi Saxena Sahni Member (A) Suresh Kumar Batra Member (J) Dinky Bansal ( steno 'd' )