HAREESHA P vs EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION (ESIC) on 2 November 2026

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE Order Sheet Item no.: 6 O.A./260/2026 (BANGALORE) [ TRANSFER ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 9 Order Dated: 02/11/2026 HAREESHA P Vs EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION (ESIC)

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri Vikram Phadke For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri Siddaveer Chakki - through video conference Order of The Tribunal Shri Vikram Phadke on behalf of the applicant. Shri Siddaveer Chakki on behalf of the respondents through video conference. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that in response to the MA and the additional reply filed by the learned counsel for the respondents, he would like to file the additional rejoinder, if any, along with an MA. Further, he also submits that he has no obejction to the additional reply filed by the learned counsel for the respondents and the MA can be allowed. Accordingly, MA No. 390/2026 regarding the additional reply filed by the learned counsel for the respondents is allowed, and the additional reply is taken on record. The learned counsel for the applicant requests for time for filing MA along with the additional rejoinder. He may do so. The learned counsel for the respondents also points out that it is informally learnt that the posting order with respect to applicants, is likely to be revoked in the next few days. By consent, the case ia adjourned to 02.12.2026. Interim order granted earlier stands extended till the next date of hearing.

SANTOSH MEHRA Member (A) Chhaya Verma ( steno 'd' )