Central Administrative Tribunal
Liaquat Ali Bhat vs REVENUE DEPARTMENT on 26 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAMMU Order Sheet Item no.: 25 O.A./1042/2025 (JAMMU) [ PROMOTION ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 11 Order Dated: 26/10/2026 LIAQUAT ALI BHAT Vs REVENUE DEPARTMENT
For Applicant(s) Advocate : None
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Rajesh Thappa, learned AAG for respondents no. 2 and 6 , Mr. Hunar Gupta, DAG for respondents no. 1, 3, 4 and 5 Order of The Tribunal (THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE) Reply to the O.A. stands filed by Mr. Rajesh Thappa on behalf of respondents no. 2 and 6. Mr. Hunar Gupta, learned DAG has filed reply on behalf of respondent no. 3 also alongwith Miscellaneous Application No. 1573 of 2026 for re-calling of order dated 24.08.2026 and 23.09.2026, which pertains to imposition of cost of Rs. 3000/- each, vide these two orders of this Tribunal. From the perusal of file, it transpires that respondents have been granted umpteen opportunities to file the reply, desite the same, the reply was not filed for about one year and three months, resulting in imposition of cost and the same was filed only today. In view of the repeated opportunities already granted, the aforesaid M.A. for recalling of the order is misconceived and is accordingly, dismissed. Reply to the O.A. on behalf of respondents no. 1, 3, 4 and 5 will be taken on record only after the cost amounts will be deposited. List this case on 04.12.2026.
Pragya Sahay Saksena Member (A) Sanjeev Gupta Member (J) Pooja Soni ( court master )