Central Administrative Tribunal

Raja Ashraf Ali Khan vs SKILL DEVELOPMENT on 27 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

SRINAGAR BENCH, SRINAGAR

O.A. NO.: 951 OF 2026

(Srinagar, 27th day of October 2026)

C O R A M

HON’BLE MR. M.S. LATIF, MEMBER (JUDL.)

HON’BLE MR. PRASANT KUMAR, MEMBER (ADMN.)

............

1.

Raja Ashraf Ali Khan S/o Late Abul Hassan Khan R/o Kathi Darwaza, Rainawari Srinagar Pincode: 190010 Age: 50 years.

............ Applicant(s).

By Advocate: - Mr. F. A. Wani.

Versus

1.

Jammu and Kashmir Skill Development Department Kashmir through its Director, By-pass Road, Bemina, Srinagar Pincode: 190018

2.

Superintendent,

Industrial

Training

Institute,

Gurez,

Bandipora Pincode: 193503

........ Official Respondents.

By Advocate: - Mr. Furkan Yaqub Sofi, GA.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Oral)

Per Hon’ble Mr. M.S. Latif, Member (Judl.)

Through the medium of the instant O.A., the applicant seeks the following reliefs:

5a2

ABHISHEK PUNIA

a. That the Respondent may kindly be directed to accord consideration to the release of the service benefits since 2018 till date, as for the act the Applicant as in duty bound shall ever pray.

b. Any other relief that is expedient in circumstances may kindly be issued in favor of the Applicant and against the Defendants.

2. Shorn of details, the applicant has filed the instant O.A. stating therein that he was appointed in the year 1992 as Junior Instructor and thereafter was promoted as Vocational Instructor. As stated, in the year 2018, the applicant sought voluntary retirement from the service while tendering his resignation which representation was duly acknowledged by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that thereafter, the applicant got busy in his domestic work when he recently found out that the respondents vide Order No. 12 of 2026 dated 30.04.2026 have issued a Tentative Seniority List of Vocational Instructors, wherein the applicant figures at serial no. 2. On this development, now the applicant seeks to join his duties along with release of service benefits since 2018 till date.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he would be satisfied, if the instant O.A. is disposed of by directing the respondents to treat this O.A. as a representation.

5a2

ABHISHEK PUNIA

5. Heard.

6. At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, the O.A. is disposed of by directing the respondents to treat this O.A. as a representation, who shall consider and decide the case of the applicant in accordance with law, keeping in view the merits of the case and the eligibility/entitlements of the applicant. The respondents on deciding the case shall pass appropriate orders within a period of 08 (eight) weeks from the date a certified copy of this Order is served upon them. Needless to mention that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits or otherwise of the case.

7. Accordingly, O.A. No. 951/2026 is disposed of along with all connected M.A.s, if any.

(Prasant Kumar) Member (Admn.) (M.S. Latif) Member (Judl.)

Abhishek Punia Court Master 27.10.2026

5a2

ABHISHEK PUNIA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead