Ramachandran K vs SOUTHERN RAILWAY on 2 November 2026

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM Order Sheet Item no.: 3 O.A./549/2026 (ERNAKULAM) [ VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 02/11/2026 RAMACHANDRAN K Vs SOUTHERN RAILWAY For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Jerry Peter For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Sreejith N Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. He has pressed for disposing the O.A with a direction to consider and dispose of his request for voluntary retirement within a time frame. Sri. N. Sreejith, learned Standing Counsel for the Railways takes notice for the respondents. He opposed any direction being issued pending consideration of the disciplinary proceedings. Admit. The grievance of the applicant is that his request for voluntary retirement has not been considered by the respondents. But from his own showing, it has come out that he is facing a second disciplinary proceedings for unauthorised absence. It appears that he is still continuing on unauthorised absence. Second charge memo has not yet been replied. The learned Counsel for the applicant undertakes that the reply statement to the charge memo will be given within three days. Call on 16.11.2026. BRAJ MOHAN AGRAWAL MEMBER (A) JUSTICE K HARIPAL MEMBER (J) Reshmi R ( )

Case No O.A./549/2026 Ernakulam Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 3 Generated by Reshmi CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench on 02/11/2026

02/11/2026, 15:53 cis.cgat.gov.in/catlive/internal/order_content_view.php?no=84175 https://cis.cgat.gov.in/catlive/internal/order_content_view.php?no=84175 1/1 2026.11.02 16:04:10+ 05'30' A X Sherin