Central Administrative Tribunal

Anurag Saxena vs COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA on 23 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

JABALPUR BENCH

JABALPUR

This the 23nd day of October, 2026

HON’BLE SMT. MALLIKA ARYA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

Original Application No. 1005 of 2026

Anurag Saxena, S/o Late Suresh Chandra Saxena, DOB – 02.11.1972, working as Clerk, O/o Accountant General Audit-II, Bhopal, R/o Room No. 2, Kishan Bhawan, Arera Hills, Bhopal (MP) - 462011.

-Applicant

Advocate for the applicant: Shri Vijay Tripathi V e r s u s

1.

Deputy Comptroller and Auditor General, O/o The Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Dindayal Upadhyay Marg, New Delhi -

110124.

2.

The Accountant General (General and Social Sector Audit), Audit Bhawan, Jhansi Road, Gwalior (MP) - 474001.

3.

The Sr. Dy. Accountant General (Admin.) O/o Accountant General (General and Social Sector Audit), Audit Bhawan, Jhansi Road, Gwalior (MP) - 474001.

-Respondents

Advocate for the respondents:

Ms. Surabhi Nigam

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

At the outset, the learned counsel for the applicant has contended that for redressal of his grievance, the applicant has already preferred representation dated 22.09.2026 (Annexure A-1 of OA) before the Deputy Comptroller and Auditor General of India Dindayal Upadhyay Marg, New Delhi (respondent no. 1) and the applicant would be satisfied, if a direction is given to 2026.10.30 11:40:59 +05'30' ANAND PRAKASH DUBEY

the said respondent to decide aforesaid representations in the light of prayer made therein within a specified time.

2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the prayer of the applicant and submitted that no such direction can be given at this stage.

3. However, having regard to the innocuous prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the Deputy Comptroller and Auditor General of India Dindayal Upadhyay Marg, New Delhi (respondent no. 1) is directed to decide the representation of the applicant dated 22.09.2026 (Annexure A-1) by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The applicant shall file a copy of this order along with copy of OA with annexures before the respondent no. 1. A copy of the reasoned and speaking order shall be communicated to the applicant forthwith.

4. With the above direction, the O.A is disposed of.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. It is made clear that nothing has been expressed on the merits of the case.

(Mallika Arya)

Administrative Member

Anand… 2026.10.30 11:40:59 +05'30' ANAND PRAKASH DUBEY

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead