Central Administrative Tribunal
Jyoti Sharma vs DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE on 23 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
JABALPUR BENCH
JABALPUR
This the 23nd day of October, 2026
HON’BLE SMT. MALLIKA ARYA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
Original Application No. 1007 of 2026
Jyoti Sharma, D/o Late Som Sharma, Age 44, Occupation – unemployed, R/o HIG-B 166, Fine Avenue, Face 1, Kolar Road, District – Bhopal (MP)
- 462001.
-Applicant
Advocate for the applicant: Shri Praveen Yadav V e r s u s
1.
Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure, Room No. 16088, Kartavya Bhawan-I, New Delhi - 110001.
2.
The Pay and Accounts Officer, Central Pension Accounting Office, Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure, Trikoot-II, Bhikaji Cama Palace, Rama Krishna Puram, New Delhi - 110006.
3.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Govt. of India, Office of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal Unit) 2, Bhopal, Aaykar Karayalaya, Metro Walk, E-5, Arera Colony, Bhopal (MP) – 462016.
4.
The Zonal Accounts Officer, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Type- VI, Q. No. 4 & 5, Aaykar Colony, Nehru Nagar, Bhopal, MP –
462003.
-Respondents
Advocate for the respondents:
Shri Surendra Pratap Singh
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
At the outset, the learned counsel for the applicant has contended that for redressal of her grievance, the applicant has already preferred representation dated 11.08.2026 (Annexure A-6 of OA) before the 2026.10.30 11:41:37 +05'30' ANAND PRAKASH DUBEY
respondent no. 3 and the applicant would be satisfied, if a direction is given to the said respondent to decide aforesaid representations in the light of prayer made therein within a specified time.
2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the prayer of the applicant and submitted that no such direction can be given at this stage.
3. However, having regard to the innocuous prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhopal (respondent no. 3) is directed to decide the representation of the applicant dated 11.08.2026 (Annexure A-1) by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The applicant shall file a copy of this order along with copy of OA with annexures before the respondent no. 3. A copy of the reasoned and speaking order shall be communicated to the applicant forthwith.
4. With the above direction, the O.A is disposed of.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. It is made clear that nothing has been expressed on the merits of the case.
(Mallika Arya)
Administrative Member
Anand… 2026.10.30 11:41:37 +05'30' ANAND PRAKASH DUBEY