Central Administrative Tribunal
DR KESHAO BHAGWATRAO NAGPURE vs AIIMS on 26 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 12 M.A./1165/2025 (NAGPUR) [ CONDONATION OF DELAY ] In Diary No.: 2876/2025 PAY PROTECTION Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 5 Order Dated: 26/10/2026 DR KESHAO BHAGWATRAO NAGPURE Vs AIIMS
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Adv. B Lahiri For Respondent(s) Advocate : Adv Bhaskar D Pandit Order of The Tribunal We have heard ld. Counsel for the applicant and ld. Counsel for the respondents.
2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that he has claimed pay protection on account of his appointment in AIIMS, Nagpur and also claimed seniority on account of his technical resignation from his earlier organization i.e. AIIMS, Raipur.
3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents state that applicant has been granted pay protection. Ld. Counsel for the applicant also concedes that respondents have granted the relief of pay protection.
4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant further submits that he has also claimed protection of seniority on account of his appointment in AIIMS, Nagpur.
5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents states that in any of the representation made by the applicant, the issue of seniority was not referred to even remotely. Ld. Counsel for the respondents, Shri Pandit submits that if the applicant makes representation to that effect, the respondents will take decision accordingly.
6. Ld. Counsel for the applicant, Shri Lahiri submits that the applicant will make representation within two weeks from today.
7. If the representation is received within two weeks from today as regards protection of seniority of the applicant, the respondents shall decide it by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order in accordance with law/rules/ regulations/extant circulars/notifications/orders etc.
8. It is made clear that all contentions including limitation are expressly kept open.
9. In view of this matter, the OA is disposed of with these directions. Pending MA’s if any stand disposed of. No costs. Sangam Narain Srivastava Member (A) Justice M.G.Sewlikar Member (J) C Kumar ( court master )