Central Administrative Tribunal
Santosh Indrajeet Ingle vs HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE on 26 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 10 O.A./802/2026 (MUMBAI) [ Recovery (DB) ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 1 Order Dated: 26/10/2026 SANTOSH INDRAJEET INGLE Vs HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Adv. V P Gawali For Respondent(s) Advocate : Adv. J K Rehel through VC Order of The Tribunal We have heard ld. Counsel for the applicant and ld. Counsel for the respondents.
2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the respondents have passed the order of recovery of Rs. 3,33,162/- (Rupees Three Lakh Thirty-Three Thousand One Hundred Sixty-Two) vide order dated 24th September, 2026. Ld. Counsel for the applicant states that the recovery order has been initiated on the basis of pay fixation made. Pay fixation was made without issuing any notice to him. He further submits that while passing the impugned order dated 24th September, 2026 no notice was issued to the applicant.
3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that papers were handed over to her day before yesterday, therefore she needs time to go through the papers and file reply.
4. The respondents shall not proceed with the recovery till next date. If it is found that the statement made by ld. Counsel for the applicant is false, the stay will be vacated on the very day.
6. Stand over to 16th November, 2026.
Sangam Narain Srivastava Member (A) Justice M.G.Sewlikar Member (J) C Kumar ( court master )