Central Administrative Tribunal

Suneel Kumar vs DEPTT OF POSTS on 15 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR Order Sheet Item no.: 3 O.A./870/2026 (JAIPUR) [ EVICTION OF QUARTERS ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 1 Order Dated: 15/10/2026 SUNEEL KUMAR Vs DEPTT OF POSTS For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri B.K. Jatti For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri Manu Bhargava Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal Heard. Issue notices to the respondents. Shri Manu Bhargava, Sr.C.G.S.C., appeared on advance instructions and accepts notices on behalf of the official respondents. At this stage, Shri B.K. Jatti, learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant had given representation to the Director General, Department of Posts, New Delhi (Respondent No. 4) who is vested with the powers to extend the retention of the quarter/waive off the damage chagres etc. but instead of the Director General, his representation has been decided by the Senior Superintendent, RMS, 'JP' Division, Jaipur (Respondent No. 2) who does not have the said powers. As such, learned counsel for the applicant prays that the present O.A. may be treated as fresh representation of the applicant and directed to the Director General, Department of Posts, New Delhi (Respondent No. 4) to decide same within the time bound manner. In view of the above, I direct the Director General, Department of Posts, New Delhi (Respondent No. 4) to treat the present O.A. as fresh NATHU LAL KUMAWAT Uploaded by me 2026.10.16 10:44:29+05'30' NATHU LAL KUMAWAT

representation of the applicant and consider and decide the same by passing a detailed and speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that till then, no coercive action against the appicant shall be taken by the respondents. Accordingly, the present Original Application is disposed off. No order as to costs. RANJANA SHAHI MEMBER (J) Nathulal Kumawat ( ps )

Case No O.A./870/2026 Jaipur Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 3 Generated by Nathu Lal Kumawat CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Jaipur Bench on 15/10/2026

NATHU LAL KUMAWAT Uploaded by me 2026.10.16 10:44:29+05'30' NATHU LAL KUMAWAT

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead