Central Administrative Tribunal
Ram Lakhan Nagar vs Income Tax Department on 9 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR Order Sheet Item no.: 18 O.A./539/2018 (JAIPUR) [ CASUAL LABOUR ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 42 Order Dated: 09/10/2026 RAM LAKHAN NAGAR Vs INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri C.B. Sharma For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri Gaurav Jain Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal At the very outset, Shri C.B. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant, states that the controversy involved in the present O.A. was also before this Bench of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 460/2020 (Manju Batham LRs Hemant Batham vs. M/o Finance) and this Tribunal had disposed off the same vide order dated 16.03.2026. Shri C.B. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant prays that the present O.A. may also be disposed off in the same terms as has been directed in the aforesaid O.A. On the other hand, Shri Gaurav Jain, learned counsel for the respondents confirms the above statement of learned counsel for the applicant. The relevant part of the aforesaid order of this Tribunal dated 16.03.2026 passed in O.A. No. 460/2020 (Manju Batham LRs Hemant Batham vs. M/o Finance) is reproduced as below: - "Learned counsel for the applicant, at the outset, prays that the case of the applicant may be reconsidered by the respondents in the light of the judgment dated 09.01.2025 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur in a batch of Writ Petitions (lead case D.B.Writ Petition No.5318/2025), which has been annexed as Annexure MA-1 in MA No.101/2026 in OA432/2020 filed by the applicant.
2. Per contra, in similar matter, the learned counsel for the respondents in OA No.458/2020, Shri D.S.Raghav states that the facts and circumstances of the present applicant are different from those of the petitioners in the aforesaid batch of judgments passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur on 09.01.2026.
3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we direct the respondents to re-examine the case of the applicant.
4. Since learned counsel for the respondents have disputed that the facts and circumstances of the present case are not similar to the abovementioned cases relied upon by the applicant, we NATHU LAL KUMAWAT Uploaded by me 2026.10.14 10:15:46+05'30' NATHU LAL KUMAWAT
direct the respondents to first examine whether the facts and circumstances of the present case are similar to those of the cases decided by the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur vide order dated 09.01.2026 and accordingly decide his case by passing a detailed and speaking order, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
5. In view of the above, the present Original Application is disposed off with no order as to costs.
6. Pending MAs, if any, stand closed." In the light of above, the present Original Application is also disposed off with the same directions as has been passed by this Bench of the Tribunal vide aforesaid order dated 16.03.2026 in O.A. No. 460/2020 (Manju Batham LRs Hemant Batham vs. M/o Finance). No order as to costs. LOK RANJAN MEMBER (A) RANJANA SHAHI MEMBER (J) Nathulal Kumawat ( ps )
Case No O.A./539/2018 Jaipur Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 18 Generated by Nathu Lal Kumawat CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Jaipur Bench on 13/10/2026
NATHU LAL KUMAWAT Uploaded by me 2026.10.14 10:15:46+05'30' NATHU LAL KUMAWAT