Central Administrative Tribunal
AMAR NATH MAURYA DIED SUBSITITUTED BY SARASWATI MAURYA vs DR N.ZAHEER AHMAD on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW 7/5, GOMTI NAGAR EXTENSION, LUCKNOW Order Sheet Item no.: 34 C.P./54/2024 (LUCKNOW) [ MACP ] In O.A./187/2013 Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 30 Order Dated: 27/10/2026 AMAR NATH MAURYA DIED SUBSITITUTED BY SARASWATI MAURYA Vs DR N.ZAHEER AHMAD For Applicant(s) Advocate : S N SINGH HOLDING BRIEF FOR JITENDRA SINGH For Respondent(s) Advocate : PRAYAGMATI GUPTA Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the proposed contemnors and perused the records. In O.A. No. 187 of 2013, we passed the following roders:-
8. Accordingly, the OA is allowed. Impugned order dated 19.11.2012 (Annexure No. 1) is quashed. Respondents are directed to grant the benefits under MACP Scheme after counting the service from the date of actual joining of the post in the entry grade with all consequential benefits. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order." Aggrieved party- Respondents preferred Writ-A No. 9622 of 2024 [UoI & Ors. vs. Amar Nath Maurya and another] wherein the Hon'ble High Court has passed the order as follows:- "1. Sri S.B. Pandey, learned Senior advocate / Deputy Solictor General of India assisted by Sri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Jitendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 are present.
2. Let a counter affidavit be filed by the learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 within three weeks and the petitioners will have one week thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit.
3. List immediately after expiry of the aforesaid period.
4. At this stage, the interim relief application filed by the petitioners is rejected. However, the compliance of the judgment shall abide by the outcome of the writ petition." When matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the applicant informed that order dated 12.03.2024 passed in O.A. No. 187 of 2013 sought to be complied with has been complied with. Hence, this contempt petition may be disposed of. 10/28/26, 12:40 PM cis.cgat.gov.in/catlive/internal/order_content_view.php?no=66980
Learned counsel for the proposed contemnors did not opposed the aforesaid proposition. Learned counsel for the proposed contemnors submitted that compliance report has been filed in the Registry today itself. As order dated 12.03.2024 passed in OA No. 187 of 2013 sought to be complied with has been complied with, hence, this contempt petition is dismissed. Notices issued earlier also stand discharged. For avoidance of doubts, it is clarified that compliance order shall be subject to outcome of the Writ-A No. 9622 of 2024 as ordered by the Hon'ble High Court.
PANKAJ KUMAR MEMBER (A) JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA MEMBER (J) Jn Singh ( ps )
Case No C.P./54/2024 Lucknow Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 34 Generated by JN SINGH CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Lucknow Bench on 28/10/2026
10/28/26, 12:40 PM cis.cgat.gov.in/catlive/internal/order_content_view.php?no=66980
Jay Narayan Singh Digitally signed by Jay Narayan Singh Date: 2026.10.28 13:19:36 +05'30'