Central Administrative Tribunal
Nadir Ali DEAD SUBSTITUTED BY ARZOO ALI AND OTHERS vs NORTHERN RAILWAY on 26 October 2026
CAT, Lucknow Bench OA No. 332/00451 of 2022 Nadir Ali Vs. U.O.I. & Ors.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW BENCH LUCKNOW
Original Application No.332/00451/2022
Dated, this 26th day of October, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Member-Administrative Nadir Ali, aged about 60 years, S/o of Late Shri Anwar Ali, R/o Azad Nagar, Takia Kachhouna, District – Hardoi. Dead, substituted by:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Arzoo Ali, aged about 51 years, S/o Late Shri Nadir Ali, R/o Takiya Patseni, PO – Kachhauna, Hardoi.
2. Nasir Ali, aged about 54 years, S/o Late Shri Nadir Ali, R/o 234, Takiya Patseni, Hardoi.
3. Ms Nasira, aged about 45 years, D/o Late Shri Nadir Ali and W/o Mohd. Ismail, R/o 103, Daulatpur, Mishrikh, Sitapur.
…..Applicants
By Advocate: Shri Praveen Kumar
VERSUS
1. Union of India through the General Manager, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi.
2. The Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Moradabad Division, Moradabad.
3. The Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer, Northern Railway, Moradabad Division, Moradabad.
4. The Divisional Finance Manager, Northern Railway, Moradabad Division, Moradabad.
5. Bank of India through Branch Manager, Branch – Kachauna, Distt – Hardoi. …..Respondents By Advocate: Smt. Prayagmati Gupta ORDER (Oral) Per Hon’ble Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Member-Administrative In this case relating to pension benefits, the applicants have sought the following reliefs:-
1. To release the difference of arrears of pension, which comes to around Rs. 80,170/- along with interest @ 12% pa from the date of due till the date of actual payment.
2. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit, just and proper under the circumstances of the case, may also be passed.
CAT, Lucknow Bench OA No. 332/00451 of 2022 Nadir Ali Vs. U.O.I. & Ors.
3. Cost of the present case.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the interest of justice would be served if the applicants are granted liberty to make a fresh representation to the respondents/competent authority and a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents/competent authority to consider and dispose of such representation by way of reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.
4. Learned counsels for the respondents oppose the aforesaid prayer; however, submit that, if so directed, at least two months’ time may be given for disposal of the applicants’ representation. 5.1 Keeping in view the innocuous prayer made by the applicants, this O.A. is disposed of, without going into the merits of the case, granting liberty to the applicants to prefer a fresh representation to the respondents/competent authority within two weeks of receipt of certified copy of this order and the respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the representation of the applicants so submitted by way of reasoned and speaking order to be communicated to the applicants within two months of its receipt. 5.2 Associated MAs also stand disposed of. 5.3 Parties shall bear their own costs.
(Pankaj Kumar) Member (A)
Warij Warij Yadav Digitally signed by Warij Yadav