Central Administrative Tribunal
Sagar Kunwar vs N/A on 23 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW BENCH
Original Application No. 332/00542/2026
This, the 23rd day of October, 2026
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA, MEMBER (J), Sagar Kunwar, aged about 24 years, s/o of Late Kaushal Kunwar, permanent resident of House No. 133/359 Naka Hindola, Aminabad Road, Lucknow.
..Applicant
By Advocate: Shri Ajai Kumar Srivastava.
VERSUS
1. Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, New Delhi.
2. Chief Executive Officer, Khadi & Village Industries Commission, ‘Gramodaya’ 3 Irla Road Ville Parle (W)
Mumbai- 400056
…..Respondents
By Advocate: Ms. Prayagmati Gupta.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
PER HON’BLE JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA, MEMBER (J) Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
2. Through this OA, applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- “a) to pass an order or direction commanding upon the opp. party no. 1 i.e. Chief Executive Officer to decide and consider the application for compassionate appointment contained as Annexure No. 1 to this O.A.
b) to pass any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the instant O.A. may be disposed of as applicant is only seeking decision on the representation preferred by him and ends of justice would be served if a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents / competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending representation of the applicant dated 18.04.2026 attached as Annexure No. 1 (page- 10-11) to this OA by way of a reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents orally opposed, however, submitted that in case the applicant’s representation is directed to be decided in the manner suggested then for the same at least two months’ time may be allowed.
5. In view of the above submissions, respondents / competent authority are directed to consider and decide the representation of the applicant dated 18.04.2026 attached as Annexure No. 1 (page- 10-11) to this OA by passing a reasoned and speaking order as per law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order under intimation to the applicant forthwith.
6. Merits of the case has not been touched upon by this Tribunal.
7. The OA is disposed of accordingly. There is no order as to costs.
(Justice Anil Kumar Ojha)
Member (J)
JNS Jay Narayan Singh Digitally signed by Jay Narayan Singh Date: 2026.10.26 13:13:09 +05'30'