Central Administrative Tribunal
RAM KEWAL PRASAD vs NORTHERN RAILWAY on 16 October 2026
CAT, Lucknow Bench O.A. No. 332/00637 of 2026 Ram Kewal Prasad Vs. UOI & Ors.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW BENCH
Original Application No. 332/00637/2026
Dated, this 16th day of October, 2026
HON’BLE MR. PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER (A)
Ram Kewal Prasad, aged about 75 years, S/o Late Shri Lalji Ram, New PPO No. 20117030790445 & old PPO No 0111070445 & retired on 30.06.2011 from the post of SSE (C&W)/CDO/LKO/NR under D.R.M.
Northern Railway Lucknow, Respondent No. 2 & and R/o 53/2
Govindpur Colony, Prayagraj, U.P. Pin - 211004.
.....Applicant
By Advocate: Shri Ravi Shankar Singh
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India through General Manager, N.R.H.Q., Baroda House, New Delhi.
2. Divisional Railway Manager, Lucknow Division, Northern Railway, Hazratganj, Lucknow.
3. Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Lucknow Division, Northern Railway, Hazratganj, Lucknow.
….Respondents
By Advocate: Smt. Prayagmati Gupta
O R D E R (ORAL) PER HON’BLE MR. PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER (A) In this case relating to the notional increment, the applicant has sought the following reliefs: “(i) The Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the respondents to grant one service increment for applicant’s service up to 30.06.2011 of his service which become due on 01.07.2011 of his service years and to issue fresh Corrigendum PPO by duly re-fixing the applicant’s pension with all consequential benefits pension with all consequential benefits along with its arrears and interest thereon at the rate of 12% per annum.
(ii) To issue any other appropriate direction or order in favour of applicants which this Hon’ble Tribunal deems fit, proper & necessary under circumstances of the case.
(iii) To allow the cost of application upon the respondents.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
CAT, Lucknow Bench O.A. No. 332/00637 of 2026 Ram Kewal Prasad Vs. UOI & Ors.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant O.A. may be disposed of as applicant is only seeking a decision on the representation preferred by him and ends of justice would be served if a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents/competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending representation of the applicant attached as Annexure No. A-1 (pages 33 to 34), of this OA, in the light of the judgment and order dated 24.08.2026 passed by the Allahabad Bench of this Tribunal in O.A. No. 947 of 2026 (Rajendra Kumar Saxena vs UoI & Ors), by way of reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents opposes the aforesaid prayer; however, submits that, if so directed, at least two months’ time may be given for disposal of applicant’s case in the said manner. 5.1 Keeping in view the innocuous prayer made by the applicant, this O.A. is disposed of, without going into the merits of the case, with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the pending representation of the applicant attached as Annexure No. A-1 (pages 33 to 34) of this OA in the light of the judgment and order dated 24.08.2026 passed by the Allahabad Bench of this Tribunal in O.A. No. 947 of 2026 (Rajendra Kumar Saxena vs UoI & Ors), by way of reasoned and speaking order to be communicated to the applicant within two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5.2 Associated MAs, if any, also stand disposed of. 5.3 Parties shall bear their own costs.
(Pankaj Kumar)
Member (A) Vidya Vidya Ben Waghela Digitally signed by Vidya Ben Waghela Date: 2026.10.21 15:41:34 +05'30'