Central Administrative Tribunal
Rama Shankar Mishra vs ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST on 15 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Original Application No. 332/00645/2026
This the 15th day of October, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Ojha, Member-J
Hon’ble Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Member-A
R.S. Mishra (Rama Shankar Mishra), aged about 72 years, S/o Sri Raj Mangal Mishra, R/o 3/239 Vikas Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
…..Applicant.
By Advocate: Shri Amit Verma.
Shri Balendu Bhushan Tripathi.
VERSUS.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi.
2. State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Department of Forest Section-1, Bapu Bhawan, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow.
3. Principal Conservator of Forest, 17 Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow.
..... Respondents.
By Advocate: Smt. Prayagmati Gutpa. Shri Manoj Dubey.
O R D E R (ORAL)
Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Ojha, Member-J
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that ends of justice would be served if a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents/competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending representations dated 18.12.2025 and dated 11.09.2026, which are annexed at (Annexure-28 and Annexure- 30 respectively) at page-109 and 114-115 of the OA by the respondents by way of reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.
3. To this, learned counsel for the respondents orally opposed, however, submitted that in case the applicants’ representations are directed to be decided in the manner suggested, then a period of at least two months may be allowed for the same.
4. In view of the above submissions, the respondents/Competent authority is directed to consider and decide the representations dated 18.12.2025 and dated 11.09.2026, which are annexed at (Annexure-28 and Annexure- 30 respectively) at page-109 and 114-115 of the OA preferred by the applicant within a period of two months by passing a reasoned and speaking order as per law, under intimation forthwith to the applicant.
5. It is made clear that nothing has been commented upon the merits of the case.
The OA is disposed of accordingly.
Miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, also stand disposed of.
There is no order as to costs.
(Pankaj Kumar) (Justice Anil Kumar Ojha) Member (A)
Member (J)
Ak/- Amit Kumar