Central Administrative Tribunal
BABU RAM vs DEPTT OF POSTS on 12 October 2026
CAT, Lucknow Bench OA No. 332/00206/2026 Babu Ram Vs U.O.I. & Ors.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW BENCH
Original Application No. 332/00206/2026
Dated, this 12th day of October, 2026
HON’BLE MR. PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER (A)
Babu Ram, aged about 70 years, son of Devidin, Resident of Lodhauri, Babupur, Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh.
...Applicant
By Advocate: Shri Avinash Dwivedi
Shri Rahul Kant Mishra
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Communication, Department of Posts, Postal Directorate, Dak Bhavan, New Delhi.
2. Chief Postmaster General, Uttar Pradesh Circle, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, CPMG Campus, Hazaratganj, District Lucknow.
3. Senior Superintendent of Post Offices (Lucknow Division), Lucknow GPO Building, Vidhan Sabha Marg, Hazratganj, District Lucknow. ...Respondents
By Advocate: Smt. Prayagmati Gupta
O R D E R (ORAL) PER HON’BLE MR. PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER (A) In this case relating to pension and retirement dues, the applicant has sought the following reliefs:
a) This Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to direct the opposite parties to provide pension and other retrial dues along with interest from the date of the retirement of the applicant for the service rendered by the applicant.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant O.A. may be disposed of as applicant is only seeking decision on CAT, Lucknow Bench OA No. 332/00206/2026 Babu Ram Vs U.O.I. & Ors.
the representation preferred by him and ends of justice would be served if a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents/competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending representation of the applicant dated 22.01.2026 attached as Annexure No. A-1 (page 18) of this OA, by way of reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents opposes the aforesaid prayer; however, submits that, if so directed, at least three months’ time may be given for disposal of applicant’s case in the said manner. 5.1 Keeping in view the innocuous prayer made by the applicant, this O.A. is disposed of, without going into the merits of the case, with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending representation of the applicant dated 22.01.2026 attached as Annexure No. A-1 (page
18) of this OA, by way of reasoned and speaking order to be communicated to the applicant within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5.2 Pending MAs, if any, also stand disposed of. 5.3 Parties shall bear their own costs.
(Pankaj Kumar)
Member (A)
Warij
Warij Yadav Digitally signed by Warij Yadav