Central Administrative Tribunal
Mohd Alam vs Union Of India on 7 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW 7/5, GOMTI NAGAR EXTENSION, LUCKNOW Order Sheet Item no.: 39 O.A./262/2020 (LUCKNOW) [ TERMINATION ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 38 Order Dated: 07/10/2026 MOHD ALAM Vs UNION OF INDIA For Applicant(s) Advocate : DHARMENDRA AWASTHI For Respondent(s) Advocate : PRADEEP KUMAR Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he has no instructions in the matter from his client. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that he may be discharged from the case. In SLP (C) Dy. No. 40637/2019, Vijay Malya Vs. SBI & Ors, Hon'ble Apex Court dismissed the petition on the ground that counsel appearing for the petitioner has no instructions. In view of above, applicant's counsel is discharged from the instant case. O.A is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending MAs, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
PANKAJ KUMAR MEMBER (A) JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA MEMBER (J) Jn Singh ( ps )
Case No O.A./262/2020 Lucknow Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 39 Generated by JN SINGH CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Lucknow Bench on 07/10/2026
10/9/26, 12:59 PM cis.cgat.gov.in/catlive/internal/order_content_view.php?no=66467 https://cis.cgat.gov.in/catlive/internal/order_content_view.php?no=66467 1/1 Jay Narayan Singh Digitally signed by Jay Narayan Singh Date: 2026.10.09 13:00:50 +05'30'