Central Administrative Tribunal
SURESH GIRI vs DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING on 5 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW BENCH
Original Application No. 332/00491/2026
This, the 05th day of October, 2026
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA, MEMBER (J), HON’BLE MR. PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER (A)
Suresh Giri, aged about 68 years, s/o of Late Guru Charan Giri, R/o- Shop No. 15, Devpura Ashram, Haridwar.
..Applicant
By Advocate: Shri Rajendra Pratap Singh.
VERSUS
1. Union of India through Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pension Through Department of Personnel &
Training (DOPT), North Block-New Delhi.
2. Chairman, Railway Board-Rail Bhawan, Raisina Road, New Delhi- 110001.
3. Divisional
Railway
Manager,
Northern
Railway,
Mooradabad Division, Mooradabad.
4. Divisional Railway Manager (Personnel) Northern Railway, Mooradabad.
…..Respondents
By Advocate: Ms. Prayagmati Gupta.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
PER HON’BLE JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA, MEMBER (J) Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
2. Through this OA, applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- “Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that the learned Tribunal may be pleased to direct the opposite paties to consider and decide the representation of the applicant dated 03.07.2026 in accordance with law and service rules.”
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the instant O.A. may be disposed of as applicant is only seeking decision on the representation preferred by him and ends of justice would be served if a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents / competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending representation of the applicant dated 03.07.2026 attached as Annexure No. 1 (page- 22-23) to this OA by way of a reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents orally opposed, however, submitted that in case the applicant’s representation is directed to be decided in the manner suggested then for the same at least two months’ time may be allowed.
5. In view of the above submissions, respondents / competent authority are directed to consider and decide the representation of the applicant dated 03.07.2026 attached as Annexure No. 1 (page- 22-23) to this OA by passing a reasoned and speaking order as per law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order under intimation to the applicant forthwith.
6. Merits of the case has not been touched upon by this Tribunal.
7. The OA is disposed of accordingly. There is no order as to costs.
(Pankaj Kumar) (Justice Anil Kumar Ojha) Member (A)
Member (J)
JNS Jay Narayan Singh Digitally signed by Jay Narayan Singh Date: 2026.10.06 11:37:59 +05'30'