Central Administrative Tribunal
Sharwan Kumar vs DEPTT OF POSTS on 5 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW
Original Application No. 332/00741/2024
This the 05th day of October, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Ojha, Member-J
Hon’ble Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Member-A
Sharwan Kumar son of Shri Sohan Lal aged about 65 years, R/o B-112, Ahilyabai Nagar, Kalyanpur, Vikas Nagar, S.O., Vikas Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-226022.
…..Applicant.
By Advocate: Shri Satish Chandra Verma.
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Communication & IT, Department of Posts, Dak Bhavan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110001.
2. The Postmaster General, Headquarter Region, Lucknow- 226001.
3. The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Lucknow Division, Lucknow-226007.
4. The Senior Postmaster, Head Post Office, Chowk, Lucknow- 226003.
.... Respondents. By Advocate: Shri Alok Shukla.
O R D E R (ORAL)
Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Ojha, Member-J
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that ends of justice would be served if a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents/competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending appeal of the applicant dated 23.01.2024, which is annexed at (Annexure-8) at page-42-52 of the OA by the respondents by way of reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.
3. To this, learned counsel for the respondents orally opposed, however, submitted that in case the applicant’s pending appeal is directed to be decided in the manner suggested, then a period of at least three months may be allowed for the same.
4. In view of the above submissions, the respondents/Competent authority is directed to consider and decide the pending appeal of the applicant dated 23.01.2024, which is annexed at (Annexure-8) at page-42-52 of the OA preferred by the applicant within a period of three months by passing a reasoned and speaking order as per law, under intimation forthwith to the applicant.
5. It is made clear that nothing has been commented upon the merits of the case.
The OA is disposed of accordingly.
Miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, also stand disposed of.
There is no order as to costs.
(Pankaj Kumar) (Justice Anil Kumar Ojha) Member (A) Member (J)
Ak/-
Amit Kumar