Central Administrative Tribunal

Meena Kumari vs NORTHERN RAILWAY on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW 7/5, GOMTI NAGAR EXTENSION, LUCKNOW Order Sheet Item no.: 15 M.A./2868/2026 (LUCKNOW) [ AMENDMENT ] In O.A./497/2026 RETIRAL BENEFITS Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 26/10/2026 MEENA KUMARI Vs NORTHERN RAILWAY

For Applicant(s) Advocate : KARTIKAY SINGH

For Respondent(s) Advocate : PRAYAGMATI GUPTA Order of The Tribunal Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records. Amendment application filed vide MA 2868/2026 is allowed. Necessary amendments be incorporated forthwith. Learned counsel for the applicant presses for interim relief. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is granted one week's time to file objections. List the case on 18.11.2026 under the category of "For Interim Relief".

PANKAJ KUMAR Member (A) Warij Yadav ( steno 'd' )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead