Armed Forces Tribunal

Daily order sheet, C1, 30 Oct 2026 on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ORDER SHEET

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 1)

OA No. 1051 of 2026 with MA No. 1266 of 2026

Ex Sep Sheo Kumar (Retd)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Shri Surendra Kumar, Advocate

Shri Yashpal Singh Yadav, Advocate

Versus

Union of India & Others

Respondents

By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. M.A. No.1266 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 04 years 04 months and 27 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No.1051 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 07.05.2027.

(Maj. Gen. Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2)

OA No. 1052 of 2026 with MA No. 1267 of 2026

Ex Gnr Lallan Singh Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Sharan Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ram Sharan Awasthi, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

3. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ram Sharan Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

4. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

5. There is delay of 03 years 07 months and 22 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application.

6. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection with regard to delay in filing of this O.A. He prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instructions and to file objection, if any, to the delay condonation application.

7. List on 07.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3)

OA No. 1054 of 2026

Gp Capt Saumitra Chaturvedi (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Y. Venugopal, Advocate

Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RKS Chauhan, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri RKS Chauhan, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

3. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Amit Asthana, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri RKS Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

4. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

5. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

6. Case needs adjudication.

7. Admit.

8. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

9. List on 10.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4)

OA No. 1056 of 2026 with MA No. 1263 of 2026

Ex MWO Ghanshyam

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of more than 13 years in filing this original application. Applicant has filed delay condonation application for condoning the delay.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection with regard to maintainability of this O.A before this Tribunal and delay in filing of this O.A. He prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instructions and to file objection, if any, on the maintainability of the O.A as well as to the delay condonation application.

6. List on 10.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5)

Ex-A. No. 352 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 320 of 2025

Gp Capt Vinod Kumar Singh, Lgs (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SN Dwivedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri SN Dwivedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present virtually.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 20.04.2026 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 320 of 2025.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 05.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 6)

Ex-A. No. 353 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 581 of 2025

Sep Hari Om (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate Shri Rama Singh, Advocate Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Ms. Rama Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing. Departmental Representative is present for the respondents.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 11.05.2026 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 581 of 2025.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 05.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 7)

MA No. 1291 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 496 of 2025

Hav Bhupendra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. Departmental Representative is present for the respondents.

3. This application has been moved on behalf of the applicant for early hearing of the case. Next date fixed in the case is 18.03.2027.

4. It is submitted that the promotion of the applicant in the rank of Naib Subedar is likely to be held in February-March 2007 and if the O.A is not decided at an early date, the applicant would suffer irreparable loss. So the matter requires urgent hearing.

5. Causes shown in the early hearing application are sufficient. Application is allowed. Case is pre-poned.

6. M.A No. 1291 of 2026 stands disposed of.

7. List on 07.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 8)

MA No. 1302 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 09 of 2026

Lt Col Maneesh Chawla

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Rajesh Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. This application has been moved on behalf of the applicant for early hearing of the case. Next date fixed in the case is 18.01.2027. Pleadings have been exchanged

3. It is submitted that matter pertains to promotion and the Board will be held in the Month of December 2026 and if the O.A is not decided at an early date, the applicant would suffer irreparable loss. So the matter requires urgent hearing.

4. Causes shown in the early hearing application are sufficient. Application is allowed. Case is pre-poned.

5. M.A No. 1302 of 2026 stands disposed of.

6. List on 04.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 152 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 187 of 2020

Smt. Geeta Dixit W/o Ex Gnr Late Mahesh Prasad Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate

Mohd. Zafar Khan, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents Nos. 1 to 4 is also present through video conferencing while Mohd. Zafar Khan Ld. Counsel for the respondents Nos. 5 and 6 is present before the Court.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued and payment has also been made to the applicant. No grievance is left.

3. Till today, no objection has been filed on behalf of the applicant against the compliance affidavit of the respondents.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. No. 284 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 423 of 2022 Ex Sub Maj Nigam Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rohitash Kumar Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rohitash Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present virtually.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 18.01.2023. Writ petition filed by the respondents against the order was also dismissed on 18.05.2026. More than five months have already passed but the order has been complied with.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

6. List on 21.05.2027.

7. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

8. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 309 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 848 of 2022

Smt Manju Belwal W/o Late Maj J Belwal (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present virtually.

2. Compliance affidavit has already been filed by the respondents and as per compliance report, PPO was issued on 13.03.2026 and total amount of Rs. 22,49,450/- has already been paid to the applicant.

3. Today, this case is fixed for filing of the objection to the compliance affidavit but till today no objection on behalf of the applicant has been filed. Today applicant’s counsel seeks time to file objection. Since sufficient time has already be given for filing of the Objection, no further time is allowed.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued and payment has also been made to the applicant.

5. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 55 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 526 of 2022

Ex L/NK Indra Kant Jha

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Shri Anshuman Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Status report filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. In pursuance of the order dated 06.07.2026, applicant fails to file his undertaking to the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that since undertaking has not been filed by the applicant so provisional compliance could not be done.

5. Applicant is directed to file his undertaking as directed earlier.

6. List on 21.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 154 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 869 of 2023

Ex Nb Sub Uday Raj Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of the order of this Bench, PPO has already been issued on 28.09.2026 and payment will be done according to the PPO. Copy of PPO filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant also received the copy of PPO. If applicant has any objection with regard to PPO, he may file his objection till the next date of listing. No further time shall be given to the ld. Counsel for the applicant for filing the objection.

4. List on 24.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 356 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 799 of 2021

Ex NK Satyendra Narayan Dubey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri AK Srivastva, Advocate Ms. Hemlata, Advocate Shri Amrendu Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri AK Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In pursuance of order dated 31.07.2026, ADG-PS, MoD is also present through virtual mode and submitted that writ petition is proposed to be filed assailing the order of this Tribunal, before the Hon’ble High Court. But till date, neither any writ petition is filed nor there is any operative stay order in the matter, so, respondents are bound to obey the order in letter and spirit.

5. ADG-PS further submitted that if conditional order is passed by this Bench then respondents are ready to comply the conditional order.

6. In this case, the O.A was decided on 19.10.2023. Three years have already passed, neither any writ petition has been filed by the respondents nor order has been complied with.

7. In view of submission of the ADG-PS, applicant is directed to file his undertaking on affidavit to the effect that, in case, any adverse order is passed against him in the proposed writ petition to be filed by the respondents, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in the proposed Writ Petition.

8. Respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the proposed Writ Petition to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining an undertaking from the applicant failing which cost of Rs. 20,000/- shall be deposited by the respondents in the Registry which shall be remitted to the applicant.

9. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

10. List on 24.05.2027.

11. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 41 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 1253 of 2023 Brig Tapan Kumar Sahoo (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ajai Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has also been issued and payment has been made to the applicant.

3. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 344 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 368 of 2024

Sub Unas Ali

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 11.12.2024. Writ petition filed by the respondents against the order has been dismissed on 06.08.2026 and now the matter is also settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court but order has been complied with.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, respondents are bound to comply the order in letter and spirit.

6. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit failing which cost of Rs. 10,000/- shall be deposited by the respondents in the Registry which shall be remitted to the applicant.

7. List on 24.05.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 438 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 759 of 2024

Sgt Abhishek Srivastava (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Compliance report filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that compliance has been done, PPO has been issued and payment has also been made to the applicant.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that there are several discrepancies in the PPO and he shall file objection. He may file objection, if any, till the next date of listing.

5. List on 24.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 34 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 04 of 2023

Ex Sub Puran Chandra Niyolia

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey , Advocate

Shri RK Singh, Advocate

Shri Deepak Bhatt, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri RK Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued and payment has also been made to the applicant. Copy of PPO filed by the respondents’ counsel is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded the fact that order has been complied with.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 132 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 1075 of 2024

Hav Clk (MACP Nb Sub) Paramjeet (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Departmental Representative submits that in this case GSL has been issued on 15.10.2026 and compliance is under process.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

6. List on 24.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 134 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 1279 of 2023

Ex PO EL (P) Sudhir Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the respondents and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that compliance is under process. She prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. List on 24.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 142 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 1429 of 2023

Vimalesh @ Vimlesh W/o Late Ex Rect Sachin Kumar Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Abhishke Singh holding brief for Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. List on 24.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 412 of 2023

Ex Sep Nirbhay Bux Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Today, this case is listed for filing of supplementary counter affidavit by the respondents which has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that amended copy of the O.A. has not been handed over to him by the learned counsel for the applicant, so, he is unable to file supplementary counter affidavit.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant is hereby directed to provide copy of amended O.A. to the learned counsel for the respondents within two weeks. On receipt of copy of amended O.A., learned counsel for the respondents to file supplementary counter affidavit within four weeks, thereafter. .

5. List on 07.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 553 of 2024

Ex Sub Ashwani Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Mohd. Zafar Khan, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Mohd. Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has already filed rejoinder affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Now pleadings are complete.

4. List for physical final hearing on 18.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1222 of 2024

Ex Hav Ramesh Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Time was granted to the applicant to file reply to the objection of the respondents which has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks further time to file reply to the objection.

4. List on 07.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 06 of 2025

Hav Arjun Pandey (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Time was granted to the applicant to file reply to the objection of the respondents which has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks further time to file reply to the objection.

4. List on 07.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 100 of 2025

L/NK Pishte Ashish Balkrishna (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode.

2. Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not available, however, counter affidavit has already been filed which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant may file rejoinder affidavit, if any, within four weeks.

4. List on 07.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 326 of 2025

WO Rajesh Kumar Mishra (retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has already filed rejoinder affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Now pleadings are complete.

4. List for physical final hearing on 19.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 342 of 2026

Hav Mahadeo Kujur (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Krishan Kumar Singh, Advocate

Shri Indra Mani Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Krishan Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the grievance raised by the applicant in the Original Application has been redressed by the respondents during the pendency of this Original Application, so, he wants to withdraw this Original Application.

3. Accordingly, this Original Application is dismissed as withdrawn.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 574 of 2024

Ex Sigmn Ram Autar Kushwaha

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. In pursuance to the order dated 13.05.2026, the learned counsel for the applicant failed to carry out amendment in the Original Application.

3. Today, learned counsel for the applicant seeks some more time to carry out amendment in the Original Application.

4. As prayed, learned counsel for the applicant is directed to carry out amendment within a week and amended copy be also provided to the learned counsel for the respondents. After getting amended copy of the Original Application, learned counsel for the respondents may file supplementary counter affidavit with four weeks.

5. List on 07.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1160 of 2024

Rect Agniveer Navle Dnyanweshwar Gajanan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ankur Rawat, Advocate Shri Sachida Nand Tiwari, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared for the applicant. Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. It is informed by the learned counsel for the respondents that Shri Ankur Rawat, learned counsel for the applicant is not well, so he is unable to attend the court.

3. In the interest of justice, the case is adjourned for the day.

4. List for hearing on 18.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 447 of 2025

Sub Indra Pal Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Order Sheet reveals that more than two times, last opportunity was given to the learned counsel for the applicant to file rejoinder affidavit which has not been filed.

3. As prayed by the learned counsel for the applicant, one more last opportunity of two weeks is granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to file rejoinder affidavit failing which case shall be decided on the basis of facts and merit of the case.

4. List for hearing on 21.12.2026.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 627 of 2025

Ex Nb Sub Clk Shyamanand Chaturbedy

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate Shri Anshuman Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Rajesh Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Original Application is partly allowed.

4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

SB

ORDER SHEET

TA No. 13 of 2026 HFL Umesh Prasad Tiwari (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not available.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment of the case. As prayed, the case is adjourned for the day.

3. List for physical final hearing on 18.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

TA No. 14 of 2026

MWO (HFO) Bhagat Singh Rawat (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Transferred Application is allowed.

4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

SB

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead