Case details

Court: Armed Forces Tribunal · Regional Bench, Lucknow
Decided: 29 October 2026
Type: Order

Actions & My Vault

Save to My Vault

Ask Compass

Court copy / source

Armed Forces Tribunal

Daily order sheet, C1, 29 Oct 2026 on 29 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ORDER SHEET

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 1)

OA No. 1048 of 2026 with MA No. 1258 of 2026

Ex Hav Ram Kishan

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KK Misra, Advocate

Versus

Union of India & Others

Respondents

By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

Decisions referred to

In this index

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KK Misra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that due to some typographical mistake in Prayer clause at Para 8(ii), he wants to move amendment application for correcting the relief no. 8(ii).

5. Amendment application may be filed by the applicant till the next date of listing.

6. List on 27.11.2026.

(Maj. Gen. Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2)

OA No. 1049 of 2026 with MA No. 1259 of 2026

MWO (Hony Fg Offr) Rajinder Lal Bhardwaj Rdo Fit (Retd) Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Shri Anand Kumar Tiwari, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

3. Ld. Counsel for the application submits that he wants to withdraw this O.A with liberty to file a better fresh O.A.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents has no objection in this regard.

5. Accordingly, O.A is dismissed having been withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3)

OA No. 1050 of 2026 with MA No. 1260 of 2026

Lt. Col. Vinita Tiwari (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate Shri Rama Singh, Advocate Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri SN Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri SN Pandey, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri SN Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 1260 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 05 months and 28 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 1050 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. It is further submitted by the applicant’s counsel the name of the applicant has wrongly been printed as Vinita Tiwari instead of Vinita Kumari.

Registry is directed to show the correct name of the applicant as Lt. Col. Vinita Kumari in the future cause list.

11. List on 07.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4)

Ex-A. No. 350 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 237 of 2023

Sub Ram Chandra Prasad

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KK Misra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KK Misra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. However Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents has filed his Memo on behalf of the respondents but he is not present today. Departmental Representative is present for the respondents.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the applicant and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 04.04.2024 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 237 of 2023.

5. Departmental Representative prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 07.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5)

MA No. 1290 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 665 of 2025

Hav Mintu Shil

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ajit Kakkar, Advocate

Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. This application has been moved on behalf of the applicant for early hearing of the case. It is submitted that the applicant is suffering from serious diseases viz. Clival Mass (Brain Tumor), Bronchial Asthma and Migraine and is under treatment. So the matter requires urgent hearing.

3. Causes shown in the early hearing application are sufficient. Application is allowed. Case is pre-poned.

4. M.A No. 1290 of 2026 stands disposed of.

5. List on 02.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 133 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 485 of 2022 Ex Hav Suresh Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Counter Affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued and payment has also been made to the applicant.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded the fact that order has been complied with in letter and spirit.

5. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. No. 379 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 508 of 2024 MCPO AF I (Hon SLT) Jitena Narayan Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List is revised.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant even in revised call. Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents has already filed compliance affidavit which is taken on record.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that in compliance of the order of this Bench dated 15.05.2024, a reasoned and speaking order was passed by the Naval Pension Office on 12.08.2026 and grievance of the applicant has been redressed.

5. Since the reasoned and speaking order has been passed by the respondents, so grievances of the applicant are redressed.

6. Accordingly, this Execution Application stands disposed of.

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 484 of 2024 Inre: OA. No. 303 of 2023

Ex Sgt Gadde Prashant Chowdary

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Namit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present virtually.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance of the order of this Bench, undertaking has already been sent to the respondents on 13.10.2026.

5. Departmental Representative apprised the Court that undertaking of the applicant has been dispatched by the applicant as per covering letter provided and compliance is under process.

6. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

7. List on 19.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 487 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 638 of 2022

CPO LOG (STD) Jai Govind Pandey (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued on 15.09.2026 and payment has also been made to the applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded the fact that order has been complied with.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 106 of 2025 Inre: OA No 47 of 2024

Sub Manoj Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Singh, Advocate

Shri Ankur Rawat, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ashok Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Rajesh Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 17.10.2024. More than two years have already passed, neither any writ petition has been filed by the respondents nor order has been complied with.

5. On the last occasion, responsible officer was called but despite the order of this Bench no one is present before the Court to explain the reasons for non-compliance of the order.

6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, SRO, Arty. Records shall be present physically before this Tribunal on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

7. Cost of Rs. 10,000/- imposed is also not deposited. Respondents are directed to immediately deposit all the cost due against them by the next date of listing which shall be remitted to the applicant.

8. List on 19.05.2027.

9. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

10. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of SRO, Arty Records.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 108 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 1403 of 2023

Ex Hav Bhuri Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Applicant was directed to file undertaking for provisional compliance of the order which has not been filed.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks some more time to file undertaking in pursuance of the order of this bench which is allowed.

5. List on 19.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 146 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 909 of 2023 Ex Sub Sushil Kumar Lawania

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Writ Petition No. 8517 of 2025 has been filed assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court which is still pending but there is no stay order.

5. In these circumstances, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining an undertaking on affidavit from the applicant to the effect that, in case, any adverse order is passed against him, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ Petition.

6. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

7. List on 19.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 316 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 55 of 2024

Ex Hav Tulsi Ram Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pradeep Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Pradeep Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that he has no instructions in the matter.

5. Departmental Representative apprised the Court that Writ petition was filed against the order of the Bench which is duly dismissed on 17.08.2026 and compliance is under process.

6. Respondents’ counsel seeks some more time to file compliance affidavit. Time as prayed is allowed.

7. Respondents are also directed to deposit all the cost due against them by the next date of listing.

8. List on 19.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 05 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 259 of 2024

Ex JWO Radha Krishan Upadhyay

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Advocate

Shri Rahul Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present virtually.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that being aggrieved with the order of the Bench, the respondents filed Writ Petition No. 12218 of 2025 before the Hon’ble High Court which is still pending but there is no stay order.

6. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

7. List on 21.05.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 06 of 2026 Inre: OA No 1213 of 2023

Ex HFO Ashok Kumar Tripathi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri DS Tiwari, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri DS Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition is proposed to be filed against the order of this Bench but till date no writ petition is filed.

5. In this case, the O.A was decided on 19.04.2024. More than two and half years have already passed, neither any writ petition has been filed by the respondents nor order has been complied with.

6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, Responsible Officer from the Department (DAV) shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order and also file his personal affidavit.

7. List on 21.05.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of responsible officer.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 15 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 820 of 2024

Ex Hav Amit Rawat

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents :Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents stated that in pursuance of the order of this Bench, PPO has been issued on 13.10.2026 and order has been complied with.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that he has no instructions on behalf of the applicant. So applicant’s counsel may file objection, if any, till the next date of listing.

4. List on 21.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 16 of 2026 Inre: OA No 438 of 2024

JWO (Retd) Neeraj Kumar Somvanshi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present virtually.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that being aggrieved with the order of the Bench, the respondents filed Writ Petition No. 14818 of 2025 before the Hon’ble High Court which is still pending but there is no stay order.

6. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

7. List on 21.05.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 17 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 393 of 2024

Sgt (Retd) Mukesh Kumar Mishra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that being aggrieved with the order of the Bench, the respondents filed Writ Petition No. 14807 of 2025 before the Hon’ble High Court which is still pending but there is no stay order.

6. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

7. List on 21.05.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 339 of 2024

Ex Sgt Prem Kant

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Amit Asthana, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit already filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not inclined to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. Pleadings are complete.

5. List for physical final hearing on 17.02.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 642 of 2024 with MA No. 735 of 2024

Ex MWO (HFO) Jagdish Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shashi Kant Chaturvedi, Advocate

Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. Earlier, recall application was allowed vide order dated 08.01.2026 but after recall of order, two dates have already passed but the learned counsel for the applicant is not present.

3. Today on revised call neither learned counsel for the applicant is present nor seeks adjournment.

4. Accordingly, this Original Application is dismissed in default for non prosecution.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 953 of 2024

Ex Nk Pravesh Thapa

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Prakhar Kankan, Advocate

Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List is revised.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Prakhar Kankan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks some short time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, two weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 21.12.2026.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 797 of 2025

JWO Gopal Prasad Bhakat (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate

Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant which is taken on record. Registry is directed to show name of Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi as counsel for the applicant in future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed counter affidavit which is taken on record.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

5. List on 10.05.2027.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 827 of 2025 Ex Sep /Gnr Lalan Pandey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Parijaat Belarua, Ld. Counsel for the applicant while Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present neither physically nor virtually. Legal Representative is present before the court.

2. Shri Ram Krishna Nigam, Advocate has already filed his Vakalatnama on 05.10.2026 on behalf of respondent No. 5 (Bank) which is taken on record. Registry is directed to show his name as counsel for the respondent No. 5 in future cause list.

3. Respondents have already filed counter affidavit which is taken on record but PCDA portion is not mentioned in the counter affidavit. Therefore, learned counsel for the respondents-Union of India is hereby directed to file complete counter affidavit on behalf of the Union of India & Others including PCDA (P) Prayagraj portion till next date of listing.

4. Respondent No. 5 is also directed to file his counter affidavit till next date fixed.

5. List on 10.05.2027.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1096 of 2025

Ex Hav Rajan Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Mohd Zafar Khan, Advocate holding brief of Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, through virtual mode, are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 10.05.2027.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1101 of 2025

Ex Nk Ravindra Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Shri Surendra Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that counter affidavit is ready and copy of counter affidavit is duly received by the learned counsel for the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents is hereby directed to file counter affidavit in the Registry during the course of day.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

6. List on 10.05.2027.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1113 of 2025 Lt. Col. Raj Pal Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Aditya Singh Puar, Advocate

Ms. Shalani Puar Dorji, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List is revised.

2. Onn the case being taken up for hearing Shri Siddharth Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Aditya Singh Puar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that counter affidavit is sent for vetting and seeks some short time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, two weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 21.12.2026.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1116 of 2025

Gp Capt Arnab Basu (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Shri Ramesh Chandra Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Preeti Mala, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, last opportunity of four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 10.05.2027.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 18 of 2026

Hav N Asst Kuldeep

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Advocate

Shri Rahul Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Preeti Mala, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, last opportunity of four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 10.05.2027.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 23 of 2026 with MA No. 29 of 2026

Ex L NK (MP) Kewal Krishan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sanjai Singh, Advocate

Shri Rajan Mishra, Advocate Shri Devansh Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Devansh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Reply to objection on delay filed by the learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks further time for better preparation of the case and to explain delay in filing the Original Application.

4. As prayed, four weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the applicant for better preparation of the case and to argue on delay condonation application.

5. List on 10.05.2027.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1238 of 2023 Ex Sigmn (Dvr MT) Subhash Chand

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KK Misra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List is revised.

2. None appeared on behalf of the applicant even in revised call. Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

3. In the interest of justice, one more opportunity is granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to put his arguments on the next date fixed.

4. List for final hearing on 16.02.2027.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 751 of 2024

Col. Victor Dcruz (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List is revised.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. Original Application is allowed.

5. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.

6. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 824 of 2025

Ex NK/DSC (GD) Narendra Singh Rautela

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SN Dwivedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ramesh Chandra Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri SN Dwivedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment. Accordingly, the case is adjourned for the day.

3. List on 27.05.2027.

ORDER SHEET

TA No. 07 of 2025

WO (HF) Keshav Singh Gurung (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri AK Chaudhary, Advocate Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List is revised.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Today, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that rejoinder affidavit is ready and copy of rejoinder affidavit is duly received by the learned counsel for the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant is hereby directed to file rejoinder affidavit in the Registry during the course of day.

5. List for physical final hearing on 17.02.2027.