Daily order sheet, C2, 27 Oct 2026 on 27 October 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name will be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is virtually present and Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents is physically present.

3. This O.A. has been filed against recovery from pension of the applicant.

4. Matter requires adjudication.

5. Admit.

6. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file counter affidavit, to which rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed on behalf of the applicant within next two weeks.

7. List on 09.03.2027 for counter affidavit.

8. An interim prayer has also been made on behalf of the applicant to stop recovery from pension of the applicant.

9. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is getting family pension w.e.f. 23.02.1989 and recovery from pension of the applicant has started w.e.f. December, 2025 without issuing any notice and without giving an opportunity of hearing. He pleaded for stoppage of recovery. In support of his contention, Ld. Counsel for the applicant has relied upon order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer), Civil Appeal No. 11527/2014 decided on 18.12.2014.

10. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

11. The record shows that the applicant is receiving family pension from 1989 and recovery has been started w.e.f. December, 2025, therefore, in view of Rafiq Masih (supra), further recovery shall remain stayed till disposal of the case.

12. Let a copy of this order be issued to Ld. Counsel for the respondents/Departmental Representative for the respondents for compliance.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Supl. No. 2) O.A. No. 1070 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1286 of 2026 Smt Uma Devi wife of Shri Munim Singh (Missing)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Kumar,Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name will be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is virtually present and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. counsel for the respondents is physically present. M.A. No. 1286 of 2026

3. Heard on delay condonation application.

4. Original Application has been filed with delay of 20 years, 06 months and 10 days.

5. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that it is a pensionary matter in which bar of limitation is not applicable. His further submission is that delay in filing Original Application is not deliberate, but for the reasons stated in affidavit filed in support of application.

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents opposing the prayer submits that explanation of delay offered by the applicant is not sufficient and he has failed to offer day to day explanation of delay.

7. Considering that in pensionary matters bar of limitation is not applicable being recurring cause of action. Ground shown is sufficient and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands decided accordingly. O.A. No. 1070 of 2026

8. Matter pertains to grant of Family Pension to the applicant which needs adjudication.

9. Admit.

10. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed by Ld. Counsel for the applicant within two weeks, thereafter.

11. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Supl. No. 3)

O.A. No. 1072 of 2026

Ris(Clk/SD) Mohan Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Abhishek Singh, Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh

and Shri Gunjun Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Mrs. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Mrs. Anju Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name will be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Abhishek Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Mrs. Anju Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Since the Matter i.e. Grant of Hony Commission (Serving) pertains to Court No. 1, therefore Registry is directed to put up this case before the appropriate Bench on 02.11.2026 as per roaster.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Supl. No. 4)

M.A. No. 1284 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 901 of 2026

Hav (Now SPR) Mahesh Kumar

Applicant Through Parokar Ashok Rawat (Brother)

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Wg Cdr Ajit Kakkar and Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 1284 of 2026

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. An early hearing application alongwith the affidavit has been filed by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant with a prayer to prepone the date of hearing since the GCM is going to be held where as the applicant has already been punished by reducing the rank from Havlidar to Sapper by way of Summary Court Martial(SCM) held on 07.12.2023 and called to attend General Court Martial for same cause of action. The case is already fixed for hearing on 26.11.2026.

4. On perusal of records, it transpires that Ld. Counsel for the applicant unable to produce the proceedings and order under which the applicant has reduced the rank from Havildar to Sapper by way of Summary Court Martial.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as mentioned in the early hearing application, we find no occasion to pre-pone the case. Put up this matter on the date already fixed. M.A No. 1284 of 2026 stands disposed of.

6. List this case on the date already fixed i.e. on 26.11.2026.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Supl 2/1)

(Case of Court No. 1) R.A. No. 33 of 2026 with M.a. No. 739 of 2026 Inre T.A No. 18 of 2025

MWO (HFO) Prakash Chandra Bhatia (Retd)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Ms. Upasna Mishra, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Shri

Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Shri AK Chaudhary,

Shri Akshay Tiwari and Shri Rama Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. This Review Application has been filed by Ld. Counsel for the applicant to review of the order dated 23.04.2026 passed by this Tribunal in T.A. No. 18 of 2025 with delay for more than 02 months and 05 days in filing this Review Application. Delay Condonation Application has been filed by the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and allowed four weeks time to file objection against delay condonation application as well as maintainability of the Review Application.

5. List this review application before the appropriate bench as and when available.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 1)

Ex-A/202/2017 with M.A. No. 750/2026 Inre T.A. No. 15/2014 & T.A. No. 1368/2010

Maj Kunwar Ambreshwar Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh and Shri Rahul Kapoor, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri and Shri Saket Srivastava, Advocates Notes of the Registry

1. List revised. None appeared on behalf of the applicant.

2. Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

3. Case called out several times but none appeared on behalf of the applicant. According to Ld. Counsel for the respondents, order passed by this Tribunal has been complied with.

4. On 17.08.2026, an opportunity was provided to learned counsel for the applicant to file objection against compliance affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, but till date no objection has been filed.

5. Accordingly, we are of the opinion that the order passed by this Tribunal has been complied with.

6. In view of the above, this execution application is dismissed as the order of this Tribunal has been complied with.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 2)

EX-A. No. 275 of 2022 Inre O.A. No. 686 of 2021

Ex HFO Man Bahadur Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Compliance Affidavit has not been filed so far. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that against order of this Tribunal, Writ Petition No. 11553 of 2024 has been filed before the Hon’ble High Court, Lucknow and after gap of more than two years neither the stay order has been passed nor the compliance affidavit has been filed by the respondents.

4. In such circumstance, one more opportunity is granted to the respondents to comply with the order of this Tribunal on payment of cost of Rs. 10,000, which shall be remitted to the applicant. The respondents are also directed to comply the order of the Tribunal in letter and spirit by next date fixed otherwise further cost will be imposed.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 3)

Ex-A. No.42 of 2023 Inre O.A. No. 402 of 2018

Ex Sub Prasanth M Kurup

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. The case called out, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. His name will be shown as counsel for the applicant when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present in Court.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits the order of the Tribunal has been complied with letter and spirit with regard to grant of notional promotion to the rank of Naib Subedar. The applicant has promoted to the rank of Naib Subedar w.e.f. 03.08.2013 and thereafter considered for notional promotion to the post of Subedar Major in DPC held in 2016 with all consequential benefits, if found otherwise fit for such promotion. In this regard, an affidavit filed by the Lt Col SK Punia on 06.4.2023 and pointed out that due to lack or requisite criteria the applicant cannot be considered for further notional promotion to the rank of Subedar Major.

3. Last opportunity is hereby granted to the Ld. Counsel for the applicant to file objection against compliance affidavit by next date fixed.

4. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 4)

Ex-A/121/2023 in re O.A. No. 676/2022

Nk Ram Pal (Retd.)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Saurabh Yadav Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. The matter regarding shortfall in service has already been settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Union of India and others Vs. Balakrishnan Mullikote arising out of Diary No. 27246 of 2023 decided on 24.3.2026. In the present case there is only short fall of 5 months and 11 days in completion of 15 years in DSC service. The O.A. was allowed 16.12.2022 with direction to the respondents to grant second service pension to the applicant from the date of his discharge and thereafter, the Hon’ble Apex Court has also clarified that the matter byway of deciding the case of Union of India and others Vs. Balakrishnan Mullikote (supra). Even then, the respondents are not ready to comply with the order passed by this Tribunal on 16.12.2022 in O.A. No. 676/2022.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents is of the view that as the review application has been filed against the judgment in the case of Union of India and others Vs. Balakrishnan Mullikote (supra), respondents are in hesitation to comply with the order dated 16.12.2022 of this Tribunal.

5. Mere filing of the review application, on separate and distinct ground, there is no ground to deny the compliance of the order of this Tribunal, which is inconsonance with the judgment of Union of India and others Vs. Balakrishnan Mullikote (supra).

6. In view of the above, we are of the view that a cost of Rs. 25,000 may be imposed upon the respondents payable by the next date. Accordingly, a cost of Rs. 25,000 is imposed upon the respondents, payable by the next date. We also direct the SRO (Record) to appear through virtual mode on the next date to explain for non compliance of the order and why the contempt proceeding may not be initiated against the responsible officer of the respondents. Meanwhile the compliance report may be filed by the respondents, preferably within one month.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.5 )

M.a. 741/2026 in O.A. No. 487/2021

Ex. Wg. Cdr Sushil Bajpai

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri S.G. Singh , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Namit Sharma , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Sri Anand Yadav holding brief of Shri S.G. Singh Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Today, none present for the respondents either in person or through video conferencing.

2. Earlier, this O.A. was dismissed in absence of counsel for the applicant. Last opportunity is granted to the applicant’s counsel to address this recall application.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.6 )

M.a. 742/2026 with M.A. 743/2026 in T.A. No. 39/2017

Ex. Hav Govind Singh Negi

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri S.G. Singh , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Sri Anand Yadav holding brief of Shri S.G. Singh Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Today, none present for the respondents either in person or through video conferencing.

2. Earlier, this O.A. was dismissed in absence of counsel for the applicant. Last opportunity is granted to the applicant’s counsel to address this recall application.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.7 )

O.A. No. 1336/2023

Ex. Hav Prakash Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Anil Kumar Singh , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Anil Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Ld. Counsel for respondents seeks time to file Supple. Counter Affidavit to controvert the amendment in the O.A. Last opportunity is granted to the ld. Counsel for the respondents to file Suple. Counter Affidavit.

4. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.8 )

O.A. No. 301/2024

Nk (XRA) Vivek Kundu

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Wg. Cdr Ajit Kakkar (Retd.) Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Sri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Several opportunities were granted to the ld. Counsel for respondents to file counter affidavit but counter has not been filed. Last opportunity is given to the ld. Counsel for respondents to file counter affidavit, otherwise case will be decided on the basis of paper available on record.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.9 )

O.A. No. 640/2024 with MA No. 732/2024

Ex. Hav Jyotir Mitra

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri V.P. Pandey, Shri R.K. Singh Shri D.K. Dixit, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri V.P. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. From perusal of report of registry, it transpires that registered notices were sent to respondents No. 4 and 5, which have not received back either served or unserved and after passing 30 days, as per registry, notices may be deemed to be served. Thus, service upon the respondents No. 4 and 5 be presumed sufficient.

3. In the interest of justice, one more opportunity is given to the respondents No. 4 and 5 to appear and file vakalatnama and reply.

4. Ld. Counsel for applicant is also directed to file reply to the objection on delay condonation application filed by respondents.

5. List on 05.1.2027

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.10 )

O.A. No. 508/2025

Ex. Sgt Kuldeep Raj Sharma

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Shri Saurabh Yadav Shri Surendra Kumar, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that Rejoinder reply is ready and the same will be filed in the registry during the course of day. He is permitted to file Rejoinder reply before the registry during the course of day.

List on 26.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.11 )

O.A. No. 550/2025

Ex. Dfr Surendra Kumar Shukla

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey , Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri J.N. Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Umesh Kumar Bajpai proxy for Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri J.N. Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Last opportunity is granted to the ld. Counsel for respondents to file counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.2, otherwise the case will be heard on the basis of material and pleadings available on record. The cost of Rs. 10,000/- is imposed to the respondents, payable by the next date.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 12)

O.A. No. 831/2025

Hav Dhirendra Singh (Retd.)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri V.P.Pandey Shri R.K. Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri V.P. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Last opportunity is granted to the ld. Counsel for respondents to file counter affidavit.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.13 )

O.A. No. 404/2026 with M.A. 489/2026

Hav Santosh Kumar Sharma

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra Shri Indra Mani Tripathi Sri Krishan Kumar Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh , Ld. counsel for the respondents , both are present through video conferencing.

2. Heard learned counsel or the parties.

3. From perusal of record, it transpires that during the pendency of O.A. No. 248/2022 (Hav Santosh Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India), when the respondents admitted that the applicant is entitled for promotion w.e.f. 1.8.2021, the court decided the aforesaid O.A. accordingly. Thereafter, when the applicant has been given monitory benefits w.e.f. 4.7.2022 instead of 1.8.2021, the present O.A. has been filed by the same applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for respondents has filed objection and reply on delay condonation application as well as on maintainability of O.A., which are taken on record.

4. We have gone through the file. According to this bench, perusal of the pleadings and prayer sought in the first O.A. i.e. O.A. No. 248/2022 appears to be necessary before passing any order. Ld. Counsel for applicant is directed to file certified copy of the documents of previous O.A. No. 248/2022.

5. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 14)

O.A. No. 426/2026 with MA No. 518/2026

ERA 2 (MACP-Chief Artificer) Navneet Trivedi (Retd.)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma Shri Amit Asthana, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Last opportunity is given to the ld. Counsel for respondent s to file objection on delay condonation application and maintainability of O.A.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 15)

O.A. No. 164 of 2013

Warrant Officer Shashi Kant Chaturvedi

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : In person.

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, applicant in person and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that as the matter is part heard by another bench, this case be heard by the same bench.

3. List before the appropriate bench on 26.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 16)

O.A. No. 405 of 2023

Miss Bishnu Kumari Gurung D/o late Rfn Durga Bahadur Gurung

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant :Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey and Shri TK Shukla, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri TK Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. On request of learned counsel for the applicant, one more opportunity is granted to file translated copy of page 64 either in Hindi or in English.

4. List on 26.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 17)

O.A. No. 928 of 2023

Smt Geeta Mishra M/o late Pnr Reetesh Mishra

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant :Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh and Shri Suresh Chandra Pandey, Advocates Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Umesh Chandra Bajpai, Advocate holding brief of Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Objection already filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

4. Reply, if any, may be filed on behalf of the applicant within two weeks.

5. List on 03.05.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 18)

O.A. (A) No. 39 of 2017 with M.A. No. 1237 of 2018

Smt Sunita Singh W/o Abhishek Kumar Singh (in custody)

Appellant

By Legal Practitioner for the Appellant :Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Shri Ashish Asthana and Shri Jitendar Saksena, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present. Dr. Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present.

2. In compliance of previous order, the respondents are directed to produce INSAS DP Rifle in the Court positively by the next date of listing.

3. If on the next date of listing learned counsel for the respondents does not appear to argue the case on merit, bail application shall be heard.

4. List on 11.01.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 19)

T.A. No. 52 of 2022

Ex Sep/ASH Ujair Bahadur Thapa

Petitioner

By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner :Shri Raj Narayan, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present in Court. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is not present.

2. Since none is present on behalf of the petitioner, in the interest of justice, the case is adjourned.

3. List on 27.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore