CWP/2053/2008 on 31 December 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

CWP No. 2053 of 2008

Decided on: 31st December, 2015

Raju

.......Petitioner.

Versus

State of H.P and others

...Respondents.

Coram

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 No.

For the petitioner: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate.

For the respondent: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Virender Verma, Addl. A.G and Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Dy. A.G for respondent No. 1.

None for respondent No. 2.

Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge (Oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time, this writ petition has turned infructuous. Taking on record the statement so made by learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. December 31, 2015 (Dharam Chand Chaudhary) (naveen)

Judge

1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. High Court of H.P. 2015:HHC:14367 ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:09:15 :::CIS