Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/4846/2015 on 31 December 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 4846 of 2015 CWP No. 4846 of 2015 CWP No. 4846 of 2015 CWP No. 4846 of 2015
Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: 31.12.2015 31.12.2015 31.12.2015 31.12.2015
Hari Singh & others
….Petitioners
Versus The State of H.P. & others
…Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir,
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Mr. The Hon’ble Mr. The Hon’ble Mr. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Justice Justice Justice Sureshwar Thakur
Sureshwar Thakur, , , , Judge Judge Judge Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 _________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan, Romesh Verma & Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Additional Advocate Generals. _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice Chief Justice Chief Justice Chief Justice (Oral)
Issue notice. Mr. V.S. Chauhan, learned Additional Advocate General, waives the same on behalf of the respondents.
2. The dispute raised in this writ petition is already determined by the apex Court in the judgment titled Raghubir Singh versus General Raghubir Singh versus General Raghubir Singh versus General Raghubir Singh versus General Manager, Haryana Manager, Haryana Manager, Haryana Manager, Haryana Roadways, Hissar, Roadways, Hissar, Roadways, Hissar, Roadways, Hissar, reported in 2014 AIR SCW 5515 2014 AIR SCW 5515 2014 AIR SCW 5515 2014 AIR SCW 5515 and the
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
High Court of H.P. 2016:HHC:4946-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:09:39 :::CIS
- 2 - same has been relied upon by the Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 6687 of 2014, decided on 24.09.2014. Thus, the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered by the judgment rendered by the Apex Court, supra read with the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No. 6687 of 2014.
3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any.
(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) (Mansoor Ahmad Mir) (Mansoor Ahmad Mir) (Mansoor Ahmad Mir)
December 31, 2015 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2015
(Sureshwar Thakur
Sureshwar Thakur) ) ) ) (hemlata)
Judge. Judge. Judge. Judge.
High Court of H.P. 2016:HHC:4946-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:09:39 :::CIS