COPC/967/2015 on 31 December 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA SHIMLA SHIMLA SHIMLA

COPC No. COPC No. COPC No. COPC No. 967

of 2015 of 2015 of 2015

Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: 31

31.12.2015 .12.2015 .12.2015 .12.2015 ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ Sh. Nanak Chand & another

.…Petitioners

Versus Dr. Lalit Mohan & another

…Respondents

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur

Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. , Judge. , Judge. , Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 _______________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.

For the respondents : Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Advocate. Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice Chief Justice Chief Justice Chief Justice (Oral)

Issue notice. Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Advocate, waives the same on behalf of the respondents.

2. Learned Counsel for the respondents stated at the Bar that the respondents have complied with the directions dated 16.05.2015, passed in Execution Petition No. 100 of 2015 and dated 06.06.2014, passed in CWP No. 3955 of 2014. His statement is taken on record. He has also produced copy of the order dated 26.10.2015, across the Board, made part of the file.

1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.

High Court of H.P. 2015:HHC:14409-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:09:54 :::CIS

3. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to challenge the consideration order, if still aggrieved.

( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) ( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) ( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) ( Mansoor Ahmad Mir )

Chief Justice. Chief Justice. Chief Justice. Chief Justice.

December December December December 31, 2015 , 2015 , 2015 , 2015

(Sureshwar Thakur

Sureshwar Thakur) ) ) ) ( hemlata)

Judge. Judge. Judge. Judge.

High Court of H.P. 2015:HHC:14409-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:09:54 :::CIS