CR/96/2006 on 31 December 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

C.R. No. 96 of 2006

Decided on: 31st December, 2015

Smt. Kamla Devi .......Petitioner. Versus Sh. Jagdish Chand ...Respondent.

Coram

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Ms. Megha Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the respondent: Ms. Chetna Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the respondent. Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge(Oral) This petition has been filed against the order dated 22nd May, 2006 passed by learned Civil Judge(Jr. Division) Court No.II, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P in C.M.A. No.50 of 2004, titled Jagdish Chand Versus Smt. Kamala Devi, whereby the petitioner herein (respondent before the trial Court) has been ordered to be detained in Civil imprisonment for a period of 30 days and her property valuing `5000/- attached. The petitioner has filed application CMP No.13173 of 2015 aforesaid with a prayer to place on record the compromise deed Annexure A-1. Application is supported by affidavit of the petitioner and also respondent. As per the deed of compromise, the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. High Court of H.P. 2015:HHC:14363 ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:10:18 :::CIS

2 parties have now settled all disputes qua the land amicably. The respondent in his affidavit has also admitted the compromise as arrived at to be true and correct. Since nothing remain in the present lis to be adjudicated upon merits as the petitioner is no more interested to prosecute the petition any further, therefore, the petition is accordingly disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.

(Dharam Chand Chaudhary) December 31st , 2015 Judge (shankar) High Court of H.P. 2015:HHC:14363 ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:10:18 :::CIS